Search for: "United States v. Under Seal"
Results 21 - 40
of 1,359
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2024, 1:43 pm
Things can be source identifiers, without being commercial source identifiers (United We Stand): confusion but not dilution actionable Jack Daniel’s didn’t purport to decide the full scope of the “noncommercial” exclusion. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 2:38 am
Subsequently, on or about September 6, 2012, defendant filed a discrimination lawsuit on plaintiff’s behalf in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Allen v Chanel, Inc., et al., 12-cv-6758 (LAP). [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am
It had to be spelled out by law under the Oath or Affirmation Clause of Article VI. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 3:03 am
We argue that state election officials, courts, and presidential electors all have the responsibility to faithfully apply Section Three's constitutional disqualification rule, each within the sphere of its respective powers and duties under state or federal law. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 9:03 am
Lone Star SCM Systems, Ltd. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 11:28 am
The Court concluded that, under the Second Circuit's decision in Publicola v. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 4:38 am
” The Houthis’ military spokesperson Yahya Sarea has issued a statement saying the United States and the United Kingdom carried out 18 strikes in Yemen in total, warning “these attacks will not go unanswered. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 4:44 am
The United States has condemned Iran over the attacks in Kurdistan and Syria, calling them as “reckless and imprecise. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
During Tuesday’s oral argument before the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 2:48 pm
State-registered advisers need to examine their states’ regulations to determine who constitutes a “client. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 5:55 am
Those who coined the term “backdoor search” point to a 2019 decision (pp. 68-79), United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 4:57 am
The incident is under review. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 9:08 am
Many judges in this District permit this form of filing because—for the reasons Roblox articulated in its complaint, motion to seal, and motion for a temporary restraining order—it is the most efficient way to address the epidemic of counterfeit goods being sold in the United States on the internet by defendants located outside the United States. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:16 am
United States, 289 U.S. 1 (1933). [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 7:20 am
See SpaceX v. [read post]
12 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm
v. [read post]
28 Oct 2023, 1:29 pm
United States, 381 F.3d 444, 450 (5th Cir. 2004); see also Crawford Fitting Co. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 3:15 pm
From a memorandum supporting a motion to permanently seal the entire case in Doe v. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:41 am
Expand all Collapse all Relevant Court Proceedings United States v. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 7:47 am
& Exchange Comm'n v. [read post]
