Search for: "United States v. Various Articles of Device"
Results 21 - 40
of 493
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Oct 2023, 3:38 pm
Richard and Mary Eshelman Faculty Scholar; Professor of Law and International Affairs Pennsylvania State University 239 Lewis Katz Building, University Park, PA 16802 1.814.863.3640 (direct) lcb11@psu.edu Abstract: Humans create but do not regulate generative systems of data based programs (so-called “artificial” intelligence (“A.I.) and generative predictive analytics and its models. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 9:02 pm
There is nothing an EU regulation could lawfully (and without violating international trade agreements) do to prevent patent holders like 3G Licensing from enforcing their rights in the United States, where damages verdicts can become costly for infringers. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
Yahoo News – Ken Dilanian and Frank Thorp V (NBC News) | Published: 9/27/2023 U.S. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
By itself, a single magazine article would be nothing of special note. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 8:58 am
" The court concluded that the age verification requirement was unconstitutional for various reasons, including that Ashcroft v. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 1:53 pm
Over the next 10 days, more than 145 representatives of Member States of the United Nations will invest 60 hours in deliberations, aiming for consensus on most provisions. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 1:48 am
Referring to the backlash, she discussed the issues at stake, especially the aftermath of the overturn of Roe v. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 4:35 pm
The Guardian and BBC also report a demonstration at the Osbourne-Rogers wedding which Just Stop Oil has stated was not organised by them. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm
Public utility regulation as a distinct field of law arose at the end of the nineteenth and the beginning of the twentieth centuries in the United States. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 8:56 pm
There are substantial arguments that the qui tam device is inconsistent with Article II and that private relators may not represent the interests of the United States in litigation. [read post]
23 May 2023, 5:01 am
In Kennedy v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 1:53 am
As mentioned above, Fancourt J began hearing the trial of four claims in the case of Various Claimants v MGN on the same day. [read post]
12 May 2023, 11:45 am
In which geographic area must the consensus exist (California, or the United States, or the world)? [read post]
9 May 2023, 9:01 pm
A low-cost alternative, if it materializes, may tempt smaller activists—perhaps including better-funded versions of the “issues” activists now plastering corporate boardrooms with various 14a-8 stockholder proposals—to nominate one or two directors to press their concerns in the boardroom.[1] However, Rule 14a-19 does not address the longstanding question of just what information the nominating stockholder should disclose to voting stockholders. [read post]
8 May 2023, 12:22 am
United States The EARN IT Act has returned to the Senate and House, which has prompted a response from Riana Pfefferkorn reminding Congress of the problems the proposed legislation causes for encryption, privacy and online speech, without guaranteeing improvement to children’s safety online. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 2:40 am
If enacted, the Act would be the first comprehensive consumer health information privacy law in the United States. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 2:22 am
Nevertheless, the article argues this feature “reinforces the importance of independent regulation;” platforms have shown that with respect to verification, if they are left to their own devices, users will be offered a feature that prioritises income generation and data harvesting over safety. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:25 am
Read the article, which argues that reform is long overdue, here. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 2:56 am
United States On 15 March 2023, the Colorado Attorney General’s Office finalised the rules implementing the Colorado Privacy Act. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm
In the 1870s, Comstock was responsible for almost 100 arrests for selling or advertising abortion drugs or various “indecent” articles. [read post]
