Search for: "United States v. Verdugo-Urquidez"
Results 21 - 40
of 84
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2017, 3:16 pm
” Instead, they argue, this case is directly governed by Verdugo-Urquidez v. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 7:30 am
All of which is to say that I hope the court sticks with the majority opinion in Verdugo-Urquidez. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 2:09 pm
Verdugo-Urquidez. [read post]
2 Jan 2017, 11:46 am
" I disagreed with that—perhaps not clearly enough—by making a point that Chief Justice Rehnquist had in United States v. [read post]
27 Dec 2016, 10:59 am
"), United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 1:51 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 1:14 pm
See United States v. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 12:09 pm
The Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 2:00 pm
United States, rests on a narrow, grudging reading of Congress’s war powers. [read post]
7 May 2015, 10:35 am
” United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2015, 12:13 pm
He covers a lot of ground, starting with the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2015, 12:48 pm
First, the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm
United States, that lower courts should look for and be guided by the “position taken by those Members [of the Court] who concurred in the judgments on the narrowest grounds” (emphasis added). [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 4:48 pm
United States v. [read post]
12 May 2014, 7:47 am
Verdugo-Urquidez, and treaty interpretation in United States v. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 9:44 am
First, the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 9:32 am
First, the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 6:34 am
Verdugo-Urquidez, 494 U.S.259 (1990) (the term `people’ described in the 4th Amendment are persons who are part of the national community or may be considered as such). [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 7:03 am
From his dissent in Verdugo-Urquidez (citations omitted):What the majority ignores, however, is the most obvious connection between Verdugo-Urquidez and the United States: he was investigated and is being prosecuted for violations of United States law and may well spend the rest of his life in a United States prison. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 10:54 pm
If I’m right that this difference explains our disagreement, then we’re essentially playing out the majority and dissenting opinions in United States v. [read post]
