Search for: "United States v. Volpe"
Results 21 - 34
of 34
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2023, 12:00 am
On 18 October 2023, the Court of Appeal for Ontario handed down judgement in the case of Volpe v. [read post]
9 May 2012, 8:08 am
Volpe, 401 U.S. 402, 416 (1971). [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 4:51 am
United States, 321 U.S. 414 (1944), has long been controversial. [read post]
20 Oct 2006, 1:49 pm
Transit Admin., No. 06-1029, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT, 463 F.3d 50; 2006 U.S. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 7:48 am
United States, the Supreme Court determined that a fish is not a “tangible object” within the meaning of a statutory prohibition against impeding a federal investigation by destroying or concealing “any record, document, or tangible object. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 11:48 pm
While the petition does not specifically lay out what portions of the relevant statutes and United States Constitution the FCC violated, Verizon is clearly invoking the APA's arbitrary and capricious test. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 9:05 am
A case that the Supreme Court will hear in the October, 2022 Term, United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 8:34 pm
State Farm Mut. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm
DACA provides protections from deportation to certain migrants, namely “Dreamers” who entered the United States as children with their parents. [read post]
24 Jun 2023, 4:50 pm
The party proffering the expert witness must show that “the witness’s opinion is not be based on speculation or conjecture” Volpe v. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 5:32 pm
Volpe, 401 US 402, 415 (1971) (decision of the Secretary of Transportation comes with a “presumption of regularity” concerning “the official acts of public officers and, in the absence of clear evidence to the contrary, courts presume that they have properly discharged their official duties”), and United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 5:32 pm
Volpe, 401 US 402, 415 (1971) (decision of the Secretary of Transportation comes with a “presumption of regularity” concerning “the official acts of public officers and, in the absence of clear evidence to the contrary, courts presume that they have properly discharged their official duties”), and United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 8:03 am
Civil Action No. 09-1931 (RMU), No. 12., 13 United States District Court, District of Columbia. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 1:23 pm
Legislatures in the United States and abroad have passed increasingly restrictive and intrusive laws in order to protect the public from convicted sexual offenders. [read post]
