Search for: "United States v. Volpe"
Results 21 - 34
of 34
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2012, 8:08 am
Volpe, 401 U.S. 402, 416 (1971). [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 1:23 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 1:10 pm
United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 8:03 am
Civil Action No. 09-1931 (RMU), No. 12., 13 United States District Court, District of Columbia. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 8:34 pm
State Farm Mut. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 12:04 pm
Several groups. individuals, cities, and counties who petitioned the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia to review the FAA's decision to move forward with its redesign of the New York/New Jersey/Pennsylvania airspace have filed Petitions for Rehearing after the rather surprising D.C. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 4:43 am
To establish an attorney-client relationship there must be an explicit undertaking to perform a specific task (see Wei Cheng Chang v Pi, 288 AD2d 378; Volpe v Canfield, 237 AD2d at 283). [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 1:23 pm
Legislatures in the United States and abroad have passed increasingly restrictive and intrusive laws in order to protect the public from convicted sexual offenders. [read post]
13 Dec 2007, 1:06 am
DC) where the the appointment of Margaret Peterlin to the position of Deputy Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Deputy Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office was alleged to be unlawful because she is not a "citizen of the United States who has a professional background and experience in patent or trademark law" as required under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
11 Dec 2007, 3:18 am
United States, 272 U.S. 52 (1926). [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 1:08 pm
United States, 272 U.S. 52 (1926). [read post]
7 Dec 2007, 9:00 am
Volpe, 401 U.S. 402, 410 (1971). [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 11:48 pm
While the petition does not specifically lay out what portions of the relevant statutes and United States Constitution the FCC violated, Verizon is clearly invoking the APA's arbitrary and capricious test. [read post]
20 Oct 2006, 1:49 pm
Transit Admin., No. 06-1029, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT, 463 F.3d 50; 2006 U.S. [read post]
