Search for: "United States v. Waste Industries"
Results 21 - 40
of 592
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2013, 11:38 am
Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims. [read post]
21 Jul 2019, 1:55 pm
United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 12:43 pm
See Brief for United States as Amicus Curiae 24–27. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 1:06 pm
[#Air, #Energy/Coal, #CA3] Quick Summaries Of Additional Cases During The Break Trinity Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 9:35 am
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 1:42 pm
Waste treatment systems, including treatment ponds or lagoons designed to meet the requirements of CWA (other than cooling ponds as defined in 40 CFR 423.11(m) which also meet the criteria of this definition) are not waters of the United States. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 10:18 am
Ecological Rights Foundation v. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 1:42 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 1:26 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Vermont. [read post]
20 May 2013, 1:32 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 12:22 pm
Under state (WA) law, the defendant had to maintain a Dairy Nutrient Management Plan (DNMP) which had been approved and updated over the years. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 11:07 am
Argument in United States v. [read post]
6 May 2021, 9:05 pm
CERCLA is also known as the Superfund, and the RCRA is the principal federal law in the United States governing the disposal of solid waste and hazardous waste. [read post]
20 May 2015, 1:46 pm
In this toxic tort litigation concerning the Pelham Bay landfill, we hold that the reports and findings of the expert epidemiologists and toxicologists satisfy the standard employed in Frye v United States, that of general acceptance in the scientific community. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 1:04 pm
The Appeals Court explains, "Two sets of petitioners, hereinafter referred to as 'Industry Petitioners' and 'Environmental Petitioners,' seek review of the United States Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) final rule partially approving and partially disapproving the most recent revision to Texas's State Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by the Texas Commission on Environmental… [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 1:43 pm
See Bates v. [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 3:42 pm
(Gade v. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 6:53 am
United States, 102 Fed. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 1:26 pm
However, these standards were vacated by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit after the Court found EPA’s definition of “commercial or industrial waste” conflicted with the language of the Clean Air Act in NRDC v. [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 1:13 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. [read post]
