Search for: "United States v. Wurie"
Results 21 - 40
of 114
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2014, 2:29 am
The United States Supreme Court is scheduled to issue landmark decisions early this summer regarding the constitutionality of a warrantless search of a suspect's cell phone under the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 3:13 pm
One reason may be that Riley has more representative facts but Wurie lets the United States play a larger role: As petitioner, DOJ can file a full length merits brief, a reply brief, and get 30 minutes of oral argument, instead of filing an amicus brief and getting the expected 10 minutes of the state’s oral argument time. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 4:37 am
In two of the new cases, United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 6:10 am
Wurie and Riley v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 11:03 am
This morning, I attended the Supreme Court arguments in the cell phone search cases, United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 12:08 pm
California, United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 8:48 pm
Ruling jointly along with United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 2:20 pm
California and United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 5:21 am
Wurie and Riley v. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 5:35 am
California and United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 1:16 pm
California (joined with United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 10:38 pm
Compare United States v. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 6:16 am
In my most recent post on the pending cell-phone search cases, United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 5:49 am
United States Supreme Court decisions that deal with constitutional issues apply to every state. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 4:38 am
California and United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 3:11 am
California and United States v. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 3:11 pm
State and the federal First Circuit Court of Appeals in United States v. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 8:15 am
In United States v. [read post]
23 May 2009, 5:29 am
Pursuant to the Supreme Court's opinion in United States v. [read post]
28 May 2014, 5:50 am
During the recent oral argument in United States v. [read post]
