Search for: "Unknown Tortfeasor"
Results 21 - 40
of 87
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jan 2018, 5:00 am
However, the court noted a recognized exception that provided that the unanimity rule may be disregard where (1) a non-joining party is an unknown or nominal party; or (2) where a defendant has been fraudulently joined. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 9:14 am
The appellate court also affirmed the trial court’s award of lost profits under the turnkey contract as consequential damages – rendering a decision that criticized defendants’ hypothesis that “some unknown and speculative intervening cause, i.e. a phantom hole in the formation,” resulted in shutting in the well before completion. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 9:14 am
The appellate court also affirmed the trial court’s award of lost profits under the turnkey contract as consequential damages – rendering a decision that criticized defendants’ hypothesis that “some unknown and speculative intervening cause, i.e. a phantom hole in the formation,” resulted in shutting in the well before completion. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 9:14 am
The appellate court also affirmed the trial court’s award of lost profits under the turnkey contract as consequential damages – rendering a decision that criticized defendants’ hypothesis that “some unknown and speculative intervening cause, i.e. a phantom hole in the formation,” resulted in shutting in the well before completion. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 9:14 am
The appellate court also affirmed the trial court’s award of lost profits under the turnkey contract as consequential damages – rendering a decision that criticized defendants’ hypothesis that “some unknown and speculative intervening cause, i.e. a phantom hole in the formation,” resulted in shutting in the well before completion. [read post]
11 May 2017, 11:45 am
Suing UC Physicians should have been enough, then identifying the proper tortfeasor, and proving the departure from the standard of care and causation. [read post]
23 Apr 2017, 1:18 pm
The Motor Vehicle Accident, Death and TextingThis post examines a recent opinion the Supreme Court -Genesee County, New York issued in a civil case: Vega v. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 10:26 am
Purchasers obtain title insurance to protect against unknown defects in title that crop up after the closing of the transaction, and title insurance policies generally include coverage for legal costs associated with defending title to a property. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 1:53 pm
As a practical matter, this is important because a defendant can blame an unknown tortfeasor, such as a driver who left the scene of the accident. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 7:12 pm
The claim asserted was that the steering system is defective because it contains an inherent danger unknown to users, and Teleflex breached its duty to warn unsuspecting users of a dangerous risk in using its product. [read post]
18 May 2016, 4:09 am
But an unknown single mother of 3 with no special skills or educational advantages, earning modest wages and perhaps even lingering in a death-spiral of pain for months on end? [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 4:54 pm
If the claimant can properly plead that the tortfeasor was an employee and was acting in the course of his or her employment that would be sufficient” [112]. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 6:20 am
Is that an absolute statement or even a bar to chasing tortfeasors for their negligence? [read post]
24 Dec 2015, 8:20 am
In the original Hunger Games movie, while Katniss and Rue are plotting to blow up the Careers’ food stash, Katniss remarks that “destroying things is much easier than making them. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 9:24 am
Related blog posts: Illinois Appellate Court Affirms Cook County Summary Judgment Order that Insurer Must Defend Toxic-Tort Complaints Even When the Dates of Exposure or Injury Were Vague or Unknown Court Rejects Scientific Theory in Asbestos Litigation; Betz/Simikian v. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 9:24 am
Related blog posts: Illinois Appellate Court Affirms Cook County Summary Judgment Order that Insurer Must Defend Toxic-Tort Complaints Even When the Dates of Exposure or Injury Were Vague or Unknown Court Rejects Scientific Theory in Asbestos Litigation; Betz/Simikian v. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 3:37 pm
The relevant injury facts At 7:20 P.M. on July 24, 1998 in the vicinity of East Tremont Avenue and Crotona Parkway in the County of Bronx the petitioner, while operating a bicycle, was injured when he was struck by a vehicle operated by an unknown motorist who fled the scene. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 10:37 am
The relevant injury facts At 7:20 P.M. on July 24, 1998 in the vicinity of East Tremont Avenue and Crotona Parkway in the County of Bronx the petitioner, while operating a bicycle, was injured when he was struck by a vehicle operated by an unknown motorist who fled the scene. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 10:37 am
The relevant injury facts At 7:20 P.M. on July 24, 1998 in the vicinity of East Tremont Avenue and Crotona Parkway in the County of Bronx the petitioner, while operating a bicycle, was injured when he was struck by a vehicle operated by an unknown motorist who fled the scene. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 10:37 am
The relevant injury facts At 7:20 P.M. on July 24, 1998 in the vicinity of East Tremont Avenue and Crotona Parkway in the County of Bronx the petitioner, while operating a bicycle, was injured when he was struck by a vehicle operated by an unknown motorist who fled the scene. [read post]
