Search for: "Utter v. Utter" Results 21 - 40 of 2,324
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jun 2018, 7:57 am by Daily Record Staff
During trial, Appellant attempted to move into evidence a statement that he believed was an excited utterance. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 12:52 pm by Guy Charles
But what makes Milligan remarkable for me is its utter conventionality. [read post]
4 May 2021, 6:09 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Motion to include evidence — Excited utterances Appellant Adrian Mayo was convicted by a jury in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City of second-degree assault of Herber Barrientos Ochoa and second-degree assault of Fredy Herrera Alarcon. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 4:15 am
Lawsuit for libel brought against public official turns on whether the statements objected to were uttered with "actual malice"Shulman v Hunderfund, 2009 NY Slip Op 02263, Decided on March 26, 2009, Court of AppealsIn the words of Justice Smith, "In this action for libel by a public figure, the record does not clearly and convincingly show that the statements in question were made with "actual malice," as required by New York Times Co. v Sullivan… [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 9:56 am by Green
When, in the middle of just the second sentence uttered by Petitioner’s counsel, Justice Ginsburg interjected “Let’s back up…,” the parties must have known they were in for a long hour of oral argument before the U.S. [read post]
23 May 2016, 2:26 pm by Daily Record Staff
Criminal law  — Sufficiency of the evidence — Counterfeiting, uttering and theft Appeals from the judgments entered in three separate cases tried before juries in the Circuit Court for Wicomico County, all resulting in convictions of David Myron Suire, appellant, have been consolidated for consideration in this Court. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 6:51 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Hearsay — Excited-utterance exception Abuse takes on many forms. . . . [read post]
4 Feb 2007, 12:38 am
The arresting officer had relied upon this provision (and others) for the proposition that he did not violate clearly established rights of the speaker, but the 6th Circuit said that any reasonable officer would have known, in light of Cohen v. [read post]