Search for: "Van Bell v. State" Results 21 - 40 of 89
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2015, 2:43 pm
No muesli mix-up likely in the world where rabbits reignSupreme Petfoods Ltd v Henry Bell & Co (Grantham) Ltd [2015] EWHC 256 (Ch) is another blockbuster judgment from Mr Justice Arnold in the High Court, Chancery Division, England and Wales. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 1:34 pm by Steve Hall
Bell (Tenn.): The 6th Circuit said a federally-appointed lawyer could not represent a death row inmate in state clemency proceedings. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 1:34 am
” In a welcome development, the CA backed the approach of Laddie J (“a judge with prolific expertise in the law of copyright”) in Cala Homes v Alfred McAlpine [1995] FSR 818 at p.835 over the narrower one of Lightman J in Robin Ray v Classic FM [1998] FSR 622 at [27]-[28]. [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 7:41 am by John Floyd
A legal fiction equivalent to unringing the bell, which flies contrary to human experience. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 2:35 pm
Summum (07-665) — right to display religious monument on government property, including public park Bell v. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 11:48 am by Amy Howe
EPA (Oct. 16) – Whether the limitations in the permit issued to San Francisco for its discharges of wastewater into the Pacific Ocean violate the Clean Water Act The November argument schedule Wisconsin Bell v. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 12:00 am
B-Roc Reps., Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) TTAB dismisses 2(d) opposition, finding BELL HILL for wine and BELL’S for beer too dissimilar: Bell's Brewery, Inc. v. [read post]
26 May 2012, 3:02 pm by legalinformatics
Georgia Shelby Bell, University of Minnesota: The Presidency as a Tool for Foreign Policy: An Exploration of the Implications of United States v. [read post]
26 May 2012, 3:02 pm by legalinformatics
Georgia Shelby Bell, University of Minnesota: The Presidency as a Tool for Foreign Policy: An Exploration of the Implications of United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 12:12 pm by Richard Hunt
Belle River Community Credit Union, 17-13915, 2018 WL 3497142, at *3 (E.D. [read post]
14 Aug 2022, 1:26 am by Frank Cranmer
The two communities have now taken the matter to the ECtHR, and in a communicated case, Executief van de Moslims van België and Others v Belgium – 16760/22, they argue that the decrees adopted in 2017 and 2018 are an unjustified and discriminatory interference with their freedom of religion under Article 9 ECHR. [read post]