Search for: "Van Royal v. State"
Results 21 - 40
of 82
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Oct 2020, 4:59 pm
On 13 October 2020 there was a statement in open court in the case of Warnes v Forge before Warby J. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 8:28 am
Thjose disruptions have spread through the cruise ship industry that itself has been the subject of several highly publicized incidents in which their ships were denied docking rights or otherwise where their passangers were quarantined (The coronavirus has sent shockwaves through the cruise industry, spurring Carnival, Royal Caribbean, and Norwegian Cruise Line to take drastic measures to keep their passengers from getting sick).Most Caribbean States have begun to prepare for… [read post]
1 Feb 2020, 5:57 am
I n September 2019, in R (Bridges) v The Chief Constable of South Wales, the High Court ruled that the use of FRT by South Wales Police was, in those specific instances, lawful (the case was brought by Ed Bridges, a member of the public, who believed his image had been captured on FRT from a police van whilst he was shopping in Cardiff city centre). [read post]
8 Sep 2019, 8:17 pm
Protecito0n form unlawful interference states the obvious--and it adds little to the duty of states to force them to declare that they will do what they are constitutionally burdened with doing. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 8:24 pm
The gage and emblem of this freedom is the sovereign state. [read post]
1 May 2019, 7:51 am
Supreme Court on the basis that US courts lacked jurisdiction in that case (case opinion here: Kiobel v. [read post]
7 Apr 2019, 4:03 pm
Liber Amicorum ter gelegenheid van het emeritaat van prof. dr. mr. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 12:44 pm
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co Hayk Kupelyants & Sylvain Bollée, Interpretation at cross-purposes: Dallah v. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 1:52 pm
Besides possibly bringing a derivative claim against Van Houten [see Tzolis v. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 1:40 pm
In Van Zant v. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 12:20 am
In the UK, this is the case of Okpabi & Ors v Royal Dutch Shell Plc & Anor, [2017] EWHC 89 (TCC), 26 Jan 2017, appeal pending. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 11:24 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 7:14 am
For example, in support of his conclusion in Kiobel v. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 3:01 pm
Is it an autonomous community, like a nation-state? [read post]
1 Apr 2017, 11:52 am
I am happy to announce the publication of my article: "A Lex Mercatoria for Corporate Social Responsibility Codes Without the State? [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 6:16 pm
In Van Zant v. [read post]
15 Jan 2017, 4:17 pm
Peep Beep has also examined the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) judgement in the joint cases C‑203/15 Tele2 Sverige AB v Postoch telestyrelsen and C‑698/15 Secretary of State for the Home Department v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 10:52 am
In Birchfield v. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:36 pm
In 1968, a court decision, Escott v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
A New York federal judge agreed to certify an interlocutory appeal by SiriusXM against the ruling that gave state copyright law protection to pre-1972 sound recordings. [read post]
