Search for: "Vasquez v. District Court of Appeal"
Results 21 - 40
of 102
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Nov 2009, 3:59 pm
I doubt that the Supreme Court would take up this case even if the Solicitor General now considers an appeal to SCOTUS. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 5:49 am
Vasquez-Algarin, addresses law enforcement misconduct (Fourth Amendment/forced entry); the third, United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 10:08 am
California’s Second Appellate District reversed the trial court judge’s denial of class certification. [read post]
2 Sep 2012, 10:18 am
Issue(s): “On appeal, Vasquez–Cruz argues that the district court procedurally erred by failing to determine whether he was entitled to a departure under the Sentencing Guidelines before considering whether he was entitled to a variance under 18 U.S.C. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 6:30 am
In U.S. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 12:09 pm
It is accordingly unnecessary to hold this appeal, and others like it, for the Supreme Court's decision in Rita v. [read post]
4 Oct 2007, 8:04 am
Vasquez-Filippetti v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 4:00 pm
More specifically, as the 13th District Court of Appeals considered in State v. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 2:37 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 3:15 am
The Court recently applied Vasquez to Pierce v. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 3:15 am
The Court recently applied Vasquez to Pierce v. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 10:08 am
California’s Second Appellate District reversed the trial court judge’s denial of class certification. [read post]
28 Jul 2007, 9:32 am
Emilio Salomon Vasquez appeals the district court's denial of his habeas corpus petition. [read post]
7 May 2010, 5:00 am
Vasquez, 39 Cal.4th 47 (2006).] [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 9:13 pm
US v. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 6:00 am
The Supreme Court had to correct a similar error recently, and modified its original opinion in Vasquez v. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 7:16 am
At the time of sentencing, the district court believed the mandatory minimum for Appellant to be ten years. [read post]
21 May 2008, 4:09 am
The district court, however, committed error in giving the guidelines a presumption of reasonableness. [read post]
28 May 2010, 8:52 am
(See Vasquez v. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 2:38 pm
In his brief, Peterson explicitly frames his appeal as an as-applied challenge to the district court’s procedure. [read post]
