Search for: "Virtus Investments, Ltd."
Results 21 - 40
of 103
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Aug 2024, 3:49 am
Greenhill Investments Ltd. [read post]
Sunlight is the best disinfectant: open justice and company law proceedings in Ireland – Eoin O’Dell
25 May 2012, 5:23 pm
In In re Skytours Travel Ltd, Doyle v Bergin [2010] IEHC 531 (9 July 201o) Laffoy J refused to hear a dispute between shareholders in camera. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 7:13 pm
Pragmatus further states that a domestic industry exists by virtue of the activities of Pragmatus’s domestic licensees, including significant investment in plant and equipment, significant employment of labor and capital, and substantial investment in research and development with respect to the asserted patents. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 3:48 pm
Pragmatus further states that a domestic industry exists by virtue of the activities of Pragmatus’s domestic licensees, including significant investment in plant and equipment, significant employment of labor and capital, and substantial investment in research and development with respect to the asserted patents. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 3:59 pm
Regarding domestic industry, Beacon states that a domestic industry exists by virtue of a significant investment in plant and equipment, a significant investment in labor and capital, and a substantial investment in the exploitation of the asserted patents, including engineering and research and development. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 8:03 pm
Leading international publishers such as McGraw-Hill Ryerson, Nelson Education Ltd., Simon & Schuster Canada, and Oxford University Press all support opening up all aspects of the Canadian market. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 4:17 pm
Lastly, the complaint states that Renesas once asserted a patent related to the ‘432 patent against Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. in the U.S. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 3:52 pm
According to the complaint, GPH invests heavily in the exploitation of its technologies and patents, including the asserted patents, through its extensive licensing activities. [read post]
12 Feb 2011, 8:58 am
The appellant was a small investor who had purchased 100 equity shares of Reliance Industries Ltd through a broker. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 12:59 pm
Judgments outstanding The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. and another v Berliner Verkehrsbetriebe (BVG) Anstalt des Oeffentlichen Rechts, heard 11 November 2010 Al Rawi v The Security Service heard 24 -27 January 2011 Home Office v Tariq, heard 24 – 27 January 2011 Perpetual Trustee Company Ltd v BNY Corporate Trustee Services Ltd and Lehman Brothers Special Financing Inc; and Belmont Park Investments PTY Ltd v… [read post]
6 Sep 2021, 12:13 am
EC Investment Co. [read post]
30 Apr 2023, 3:10 pm
Kea Investments Ltd (Kea), a British Virgin Islands company, alleged that the US default judgment was based on fabricated claims intended to defraud Kea. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 1:42 am
Berrisford v Mexfield Housing Co-operative Ltd (Rev 1) [2011] UKSC 32What happens to a lease for an uncertain term? [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 1:42 am
Berrisford v Mexfield Housing Co-operative Ltd (Rev 1) [2011] UKSC 32What happens to a lease for an uncertain term? [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 1:24 pm
Ltd v. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 4:31 pm
In substance, Arnold J said no [the IPKat says, this is consonant with the position recently taken by the General Court with regard to appeals against successful rulings in invalidity proceedings in Case T-300/08 Hoo Hing Holdings Ltd v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, Tresplain Investments Ltd]. [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 3:14 am
By virtue of the South African Constitution, the court is the appropriate platform to deal with such issues. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 7:27 pm
Although there was a subsequent decision of the single judge to the contrary in Niskalp Investments and Trading Company Ltd. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 12:26 am
However, ultimately in the matter of Cape Pacific Ltd v Lubner Controlling Investments (Pty) Ltd [1995] ZASCA 53 (also 1995 4 SA 790 (A)) the Appellate Division laid down that each inquiry as to whether or not the corporate veil should be lifted necessitates an enquiry into the facts, with emphasis being placed on the substance rather than the form of any corporate action taken. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 5:10 am
However, the state-owned and -subsidized Chinese company CRRC Corporation Ltd. [read post]
