Search for: "Voter v. Voter"
Results 21 - 40
of 6,658
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2024, 3:00 am
The chief target of these efforts lately has been the author of the decision that overturned Roe v. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 8:44 am
In its 2022 decision — Dobbs v. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 7:39 am
This Politico piece describes a fight that’s probably as much about statewide uniformity v. local control as it is about voter ID and securing data. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court, in the seminal case of Michigan v. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 8:17 am
Kennedy v. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 9:30 pm
In our lead story, the first of two parts, a team of UCLA researchers explores how California systematically discriminated during its first hundred years against different groups of prospective voters, employing some of the same tools used under the Jim Crow regime of the South. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 3:53 pm
A copy of the Court’s June 10, 2024, order in Facebook, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 5:50 am
For example, in Watts v. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 1:48 am
Voters should, among other things, be given clear information about how a party is using their data, be told if a political party is using profiling techniques and understand if and how they are being targeted by social media advertising. [read post]
2 Jun 2024, 11:08 pm
See also Michigan v. [read post]
2 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm
Indeed, the Supreme Court in 1975 in Taylor v. [read post]
1 Jun 2024, 12:32 am
If Buckley v. [read post]
30 May 2024, 7:58 am
Inc. v. [read post]
29 May 2024, 9:01 pm
In the 2014 Noel Canning v. [read post]
28 May 2024, 10:03 am
Wade, Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
28 May 2024, 5:59 am
In Trump v. [read post]
28 May 2024, 5:42 am
Phillips also argued that the unilateral amendment right made the contract illusory, an argument that succeeded in the Harris v. [read post]
23 May 2024, 10:05 pm
A. v. [read post]
23 May 2024, 6:03 pm
Johnson and Shaw v. [read post]
23 May 2024, 1:23 pm
“[I]nferring bad faith based on the racial effects of a political gerrymander in a jurisdiction in which race and partisan preference are very closely correlated” would, Alito suggested, allow litigants and courts to circumvent the Supreme Court’s 2019 decision in Rucho v. [read post]
