Search for: "W. Branch" Results 21 - 40 of 2,198
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Apr 2024, 5:00 am by Bernard Clark
Specifically, you should head to the Records Division, which is located at 324 W Evans St, Florence, SC 29501. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 5:52 am by Eugene Volokh
The right to public access "protects the public's ability to oversee and monitor the workings of the Judicial Branch," and "promotes the institutional integrity of the Judicial Branch," Company Doe v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 6:05 am by Katherine Yon Ebright
A long line of cases endorses the principle that “[w]ho is the sovereign, de jure or de facto, of a territory is not a judicial, but is a political question, the determin [read post]
18 Feb 2024, 10:10 am by Yosi Yahoudai
The library already has a private security officer inside the branch during open hours, she said. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 3:05 pm by Marty Lederman
 This post and the next are follow-ups to my collection of posts on Trump v. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
 So while the Taft Court made use of the Judges’ Bill to reduce its number of full opinions, those opinions “were otherwise virtually indistinguishable from those of the White Court in terms of their length, their time of composition, and their rates of unanimity,” Robert concludes.[30]  The dedication to “institutional solidarity”[31] and the  “norm of acquiescence”[32] stayed strong until both were “undermined from within” during… [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 11:11 am by Andrew Weissmann
The Special Counsel Robert Hur report has been grossly mischaracterized by the press. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 1:07 am by INFORRM
The event will be both in person – at Columbia University Davis Auditorium, 530 W 120th St, New York, NY, 10027 – and online. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
” In addition, in February 2023 Senior Deputy Comptroller and Chief Counsel Ben W. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 9:18 am by Keith E. Whittington
The federal prosecution of a former President fits the case "[w]hen judicial action is needed to serve broad public interests" in order to "vindicate the public interest in an ongoing criminal prosecution. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 5:00 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
The court was satisfied that, “[w]hile the Plaintiff’s misconduct flows from one incident, it is not a one-off lapse in judgment. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 5:00 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
The court was satisfied that, “[w]hile the Plaintiff’s misconduct flows from one incident, it is not a one-off lapse in judgment. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 7:45 am by Evan George
That’s up only slightly from the Trump years, but down compared to previous administrations, including that of George W. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 9:32 am by Rebecca Tushnet
We consider some possible explanations for the inconsistency: the possibility that the Court just doesn’t see First Amendment issues in IP cases; the possibility that a political realignment has left conservative justices less enchanted with speech in the marketplace; and the possibility that this is part of a broader trend away from holding courts to the same constitutional standard as the other branches of government, combined with statutes that leave room for substantial judicial… [read post]