Search for: "W. D."
Results 21 - 40
of 14,154
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jun 2024, 7:00 am
22-2779-cv Felton v. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 10:30 pm
Dudzinski, Jay D. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 9:26 pm
Between 2017 and 2018, I wrote more about Section 212(f) than I'd care to recall. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 3:54 pm
On March 22, CBRE’s senior real estate manager asked for an updated timeline “without a permit,” indicating, “[w]e’ll probably get started on this one right away. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 1:07 pm
§ 7436(d). [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 10:30 am
Darüberhinaus wäre (und war) seine Person mit zumutbarem Aufwand auch mittels technischer Hilfsmittel, d.h. mittels Abfragen anhand der erhobenen IP-Adresse und Telefonnummer, bestimmbar […]. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm
The appellate court added that “[w]hether the Union contributed further chill by publicizing news of the alleged unfair labor practices is largely beside the point, as Starbucks has provided no basis on which to suspect the Union ‘spread[] rumors or sensationalized wholly unsubstantiated charges against it. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 8:37 pm
United States, which is “[w]hether a crime that requires proof of bodily injury or death, but can be committed by failing to take action, has as an element the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force. [read post]
31 May 2024, 9:30 pm
D. [read post]
31 May 2024, 6:03 pm
[W]e issued notice to Judge Welch that his order may have violated the Code of Judicial Conduct…. [read post]
31 May 2024, 9:40 am
I mean, I suppose you can call it a win with a lower-case small-font “w. [read post]
29 May 2024, 4:58 pm
Speaking as a case book author, I'd like to see a much shorter opinion. [read post]
29 May 2024, 3:52 pm
For scholarly publications, Rule 10.7.1(d) adds a descriptive parenthetical note for citing cases where an enslaved person was involved, and provides examples like “Wall v. [read post]
27 May 2024, 10:00 am
“[W]e are not leading in any area? [read post]
27 May 2024, 9:29 am
Background In case T-757/22, Puma filed an application for a declaration of invalidity against RCD no. 004160273-0015 for ‘footwear’ with the following views: Case T-758/22 concerned an invalidity application of Puma against RCD no. 008367742-0013 for ‘footwear’ with the following views: Puma based the applications on a lack of individual character (Art. 25(1)(b), Art. 6 Community Design Regulation, ‘CDR’) because of the following earlier designs: (RCD no.… [read post]
26 May 2024, 7:58 am
— full story Antioch Police Calls Assault w/Deadly Weapon 5/13 – 3900 block Lone Tree Way 5/14 – 4500 block Sand Creek Rd. [read post]
24 May 2024, 9:30 pm
John Kirk, George W. [read post]
24 May 2024, 6:51 pm
As she noted, “[w]hen the Constitution’s text does not provide a limit to a coordinate branch’s power, we should not lightly assume that Article III implicitly directs the Judiciary to find one. [read post]
24 May 2024, 4:59 am
In re Rise Above, Serial No. 88735273 (May 13, 2024) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Peter W. [read post]
23 May 2024, 7:07 pm
" House Office of the Legislative Counsel, Style Manual; Drafting Suggestions for the Trained Drafter §102(c), p. 2 (1989); see also D. [read post]
