Search for: "W. T. Grant Co., in Re"
Results 21 - 40
of 666
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jul 2010, 6:36 am
” Granted, they’re not walking into Boeing with lucrative retention agreements, like the top executives are. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 2:54 am
R (T & Anor) v SSHD & Anor, heard 9 – 10 December 2013. [read post]
7 Jan 2008, 11:27 am
See Antioch Co., 210 F.R.D. at 653; Rowe Entm't, 205 F.R.D. at 433; Simon Prop. [read post]
6 Sep 2021, 5:21 am
Finally, the court found "[t]he fact that the specific bequest to [Michael] is greater in the 2015 Will than in prior wills, leads this [c]ourt to the inescapable conclusion that Ms. [read post]
19 Feb 2022, 3:07 pm
Today: lots of rulemaking; CO tasked w/standing up and administering Copyright Claims Board; they’re doing all sorts of rulemaking, including 1201. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 4:30 am
Advance Stores Co., Inc., No. 5:11CV34, 2011 WL 2038596 (N.D.W. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 12:56 pm
YenWe’re just going round and round. [read post]
2 May 2016, 2:30 pm
Most of our members are 1-2 person studios w/o that manpower; mostly they can’t even ID who they’re after. [read post]
22 May 2020, 2:31 pm
§ 13-21-111.5(4).[21] [1] James W. [read post]
7 May 2010, 9:37 am
” Forum non conveniens doesn’t require that the factors “strongly favor” dismissal In re Ensco Offshore International Co., Ensco International Incorporated and Ensco Offshore Company, individually and as successor-in-interest of Chiles Offshore, Inc., No. 09-0317 (per curiam) In a per curiam opinion, the Texas Supreme Court held that the trial court abused its discretion by refusing to dismiss under the forum non conveniens statute. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 7:55 am
Insurance cos. have a very hard time calculating the value of patents; it’s not just scope but novelty, obviousness, survival through litigation. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 4:54 pm
TM office may get in the news more; articles about “how dare they grant a patent to this thing” don’t seem to appear. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 10:03 am
Also argued that court should grant relief as far as possible to the senior user in restricting TM like or large print uses on D’s goods of descriptive terms w/secondary meaning. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 7:13 am
Co. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 9:39 am
CONTU specified specific amendments & Congress followed, but you’re not happy w/specificity of results—any reason to think it would be better this time? [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 5:00 am
In fact, Eliza Presley (who had her name legally changed from Alice Elizabeth Tiffin this summer) was granted the right to re-open Vernon's Estate in October. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 12:04 pm
Speech as part of community/co-creation. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 9:36 am
Q: would be hard for CO to say that commerciality isn’t part of fair use. [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 9:16 am
Great unanswered Q—we don’t want to think of patent prosecutors as co-inventors, but it’s a fact. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 3:05 pm
In the reply comment notice, CO asked are there any neutral principles? [read post]
