Search for: "W. v. H."
Results 21 - 40
of 2,247
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2024, 8:18 am
Italian Sons & Daughters of America v. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 10:32 am
Mas há ainda outra maquinação em curso na fotografia: a maquinação da semelhança. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
For many business economists and legal academics, the purpose of any business organization is simply stated: to maximize profits. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
" Citing SCS Commc’ns, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
" Citing SCS Commc’ns, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2024, 5:14 am
[3] See, e.g., Thomas W. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 12:17 pm
"] This week, the Office of the Solicitor General filed a petition for certiorari in FDA v. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 1:01 pm
However, the Court held in Riether v. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 5:52 am
Additional Protocol I, article 50(3); ICTY Prosecutor v. [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 12:24 pm
In a February 2024 tweet, Shugerman admits that his position was made "w/o explicit confirmation. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 7:15 pm
Harold H. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 12:28 am
District Court Judge William H. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 7:28 am
State v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
., Lochner v. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 3:05 pm
v. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 7:17 am
“[W]hether the court will be able to fashion a reasonable allocation of parental responsibilities between all parents if the relocation occurs. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 6:20 am
Strickley v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm
As I explained in one of my earlier posts, several or all of the Justices might be inclined to decide the case on some ground that doesn’t require the Court to decide whether Donald Trump is eligible to be President, if such an “off-ramp” solution is legally available. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 6:29 pm
” 395 U.S. at 447; see also Counterman v. [read post]