Search for: "WILLIAMS v. CALIFORNIA" Results 21 - 40 of 3,294
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2024, 7:42 am by Dave Maass
Last year, Mendocino County in California repealed its policy of charging illegal public records fees after local journalists and activists used The Foilies’ "The Transparency Tax Award" in their advocacy against the rule. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 4:59 am by John Coyle
John Coyle (University of North Carolina School of Law) William Dodge (University of California, Davis School of Law) Aaron Simowitz (Willamette University College of Law) [This post is cross-posted at Transnational Litigation Blog] [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 9:00 am by William Banks
This history is analyzed in greater depth in , Soldiers on the Home Front: The Domestic Role of the American Military (2016) by William C. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 3:33 pm by Marty Lederman
  As Derek Muller has explained, that practice appears to have begun in 1968, when California and New York refused to include the name of the 33-year-old Eldridge Cleaver to appear on their ballots for President (see Cleaver v. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 7:00 am by Norman L. Eisen
Complaint in Superior Court of California (March 20, 2018) Common Cause FEC Complaint re: Michael Cohen et al. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 11:05 am by Terry Hart
In response, UIRC filed a copyright infringement suit against William Blair. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 5:07 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
State of California (5th—F084367) Residential Employees Performing In-Home Supportive Services—Employment Relationship with State of California—Vicarious Liability—Court of Appeal, affirming trial court’s dismissal order, held that State of California (State) had no employment relationship (either as joint or special employer) with In-Home Supportive… Digests of WCAB Decisions Denied Judicial Review Innovative Work Comp Solutions, LLC… [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 3:27 pm by Philip Pillsbury
Ohio National Life Assurance Corp., the California Court of Appeal recently held that the answer is no, and in Albers v. [read post]