Search for: "WOLFE v. STANFORD" Results 21 - 40 of 62
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2017, 5:14 pm by Adrian Vermeule
Justice Elena Kagan, in an event at Stanford, called Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia’s lone dissent in Morrison v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 1:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
John's University School of LawKatherine Schostok, DePaul University College of LawAllison Winnike, University of Houston Law Center 5:00 – 7:00 PM Welcome Reception – Henson Atrium, Georgia State Law Friday, June 9, 20177:30 – 8:15 AM Registration & Breakfast – Henson Atrium, Georgia State Law 8:15 – 8:30 AM Opening Remarks – Ceremonial Courtroom, Georgia State LawWendy Hensel, Interim Dean and Professor of Law, Georgia State University College of… [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 4:40 am by Edith Roberts
” In an essay in the Stanford Law Review Online, David Freeman Engstrom and Jonah Gelbach discuss California Public Employees Retirement System v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 10:47 am by Andrew Hamm
For USA Today, Richard Wolf reports on Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s opera debut at the John F. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 10:09 am by Stuart Benjamin
See id. at 699 (Scalia, J., dissenting) (“this wolf comes as a wolf”); see also Stanford Lawyer, Spring 2015, at 4 (quoting Justice Kagan’s statement that Justice Scalia’s dissent in Morrison is “one of the greatest dissents ever written and every year it gets better”). [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 5:15 am by Edith Roberts
United States and Shaw v. [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 6:06 am
Roper, Stanford University, on Thursday, September 1, 2016 Tags: Basic, Disclosure, Erica John Fund v. [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 6:04 am
Gilson, Columbia University, and Alan Schwartz, Yale University, on Thursday, August 25, 2016 Tags: Airgas v. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 6:00 am by Amy Howe
At Stanford Lawyer’s Legal Aggregate, Michael McConnell discusses the March 23 oral argument in Zubik v. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 10:27 am by Andrew Hamm
Nine members of the Stanford Law Faculty provide commentary on Scalia’s legacy at the school’s blog. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
On the same day Dingemans J gave judgment in Lokhova v Tymula ([2016] EWHC 225 (QB))(heard 26 and 27 January 2016). [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 3:45 am by Amy Howe
’” In an essay for the Stanford Law Review Online, Michael Pierce discusses the Court’s recent decisions in Bond v. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 5:31 am by Amy Howe
In Arizona Legislature v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 2:39 am by Amy Howe
Commentary on Glossip v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 3:36 pm by Andrew Hamm
This morning the Court announced its decision in King v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 3:56 am by Amy Howe
  In USA Today, Richard Wolf reports on the role of Stanford law students in the case. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 2:58 am by Amy Howe
Briefly: At Cato at Liberty, Ilya Shapiro discusses the amicus brief that Cato filed in next Term’s Heien v. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 4:37 am by Amy Howe
Wurie and Riley v. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 6:23 am by INFORRM
Resolved cases included: Chris Magee v Daily Mirror, Clause 1, 22/02/2013; Mr Nicholas Thomas v The Independent, Clause 1, 21/02/2013; Steven Wolf v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 21/02/2013; Mr Orhan Bicer v Middleton Guardian, Clause 1, 21/02/2013; Mr Darren Meldrum v The Scottish Sun, Clause 3, 21/02/2013; Mr Simon Sanderson v Daily Mail, Clauses 1, 12, 21/02/2013; Mr William McNee v Daily Record, Clauses 3, 6, 21/02/2013; Mr William… [read post]