Search for: "WOOD & CO. v. WOOD" Results 21 - 40 of 1,031
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Dec 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Yahoo News – Michael Bender and Anjali Huynh (New York Times) | Published: 11/29/2023 Since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
25 Nov 2023, 9:26 am by Mavrick Law Firm
  Concerning this often raised defense, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, in Woods v. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 4:07 am by Peter Mahler
My co-panelists Chris Mercer (Mercer Capital) and William Savino (Woods Oviatt Gilman LLP) respectively spoke about the marketability discount in fair value appraisal proceedings and caselaw developments concerning closely held business corporations. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
See also South Hetton Coal Co v North-Eastern News Association [1894] 1 QB 133; Jones v Halton [1909] 2 KB 444; Browne v DC Thomson & Co [1912] SC 359; Irish People’s Assurance Society v City of Dublin Assurance Company Ltd [1929] IR 25 (SC); Knuppfer v London Express Newspaper Ltd [1944] AC 116, [1944] UKHL 1 (03 April 1944); Awolowo v Zik Enterprises… [read post]
1 Oct 2023, 3:03 pm by Larry
In a 1984 decision called Jarvis Clark Co. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 5:55 am by Richard Ponzio
The PGA must quickly appoint, to steward work on the Pact’s five chapters, the strongest and most balanced co-facilitator teams possible, who would be wise to heed the recent SOTF-targeted recommendations by respected international statespersons. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 6:47 pm
Indeed, its basis rooted in the sensibilities and political outlook first crystalized in the Bandung Conference, also reflected the five principles  for peaceful co-existence developed in the regularization of Chinese Indian relations (as touchy as they remain to this day) and which now serve as the foundation for Chinese Socialist Internationalism: mutual respect for sovereignty, non-aggression, non-interference in internal affairs, and equality. [read post]