Search for: "WYETH HOLDINGS V US" Results 21 - 40 of 451
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jul 2011, 6:58 am by Bexis
  But we thought our readers would benefit from knowing about three recent opinions excluding certain plaintiff experts in an HT case.Just the holdings, then:Opinion #1:  Hines v. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
But because federal law requires that generic manufacturers use verbatim the labeling initially prepared by the inventor of the drug - here, Wyeth - plaintiff got a second bite at the apple against Wyeth, even though she indisputably never used Wyeth's drug, and Wyeth no longer even manufactured it. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 1:20 pm by Bexis
It's no secret that non-medical device preemption arguments haven't been as successful after Wyeth v. [read post]
Wyeth LLC, IP High Court Case No. 2020 (Gyo-Ke) 10015; Decision date: May 17, 2021) filed by Merck Sharp & Dohme (“MSD”) as an appeal from a JPO trial decision holding Wyeth’s patent valid. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 1:28 am
The principle (derivedfrom the Supremacy Clause) that a federal law can supersede or supplant anyinconsistent state law or regulation.In a very recent 6-3 decision, turning on federal preemption of state law, theSupreme Court held in Wyeth v. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 1:28 am
The principle (derivedfrom the Supremacy Clause) that a federal law can supersede or supplant anyinconsistent state law or regulation.In a very recent 6-3 decision, turning on federal preemption of state law, theSupreme Court held in Wyeth v. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 1:28 am
The principle (derivedfrom the Supremacy Clause) that a federal law can supersede or supplant anyinconsistent state law or regulation.In a very recent 6-3 decision, turning on federal preemption of state law, theSupreme Court held in Wyeth v. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 12:59 pm
Wyeth-Ayerst Labs, 385 F.3d 961 (6th Cir. 2002), or the Second Circuit in Desiano v. [read post]