Search for: "Wales v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue" Results 21 - 37 of 37
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Nov 2014, 2:15 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Anson v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 27 October 2014. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Anson v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 27 October 2014. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 11:54 am
 This is what he writes:Preventing counterfeit goods transiting through the EU: an updateReaders may recall that, in the England and Wales High Court ruling in Nokia Corporation v Her Majesty's Commissioners of Revenue & Customs [2009] EWHC 1903 (Ch) [noted by the IPKat here], the then Mr Justice Kitchin refused -- upon the proper interpretation of the old Customs Regulation 1383/2003 -- Nokia's application for judicial… [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 5:13 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
International Energy Group Ltd v Zurich Insurance plc, heard 15 and 16 July 2014. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 5:09 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Anson v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 27 October 2014. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 1:59 am by Matrix Law
Sara & Hossein Asset Holdings Ltd (a company incorporated in the British Virgin Islands) v Blacks Outdoor Retail Ltd, heard 8th November 2022 R (on the application of Pearce and another) v Parole Board of England and Wales, heard 9th November 2022 News Corp UK & Ireland Ltd v Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 22nd November 2022 R (on the application of Maguire) v His… [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 4:40 am by INFORRM
She has appeared at the Supreme Court in a number of significant cases including representing Liberty in DSD v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis, which imposed an operational duty on the police force to conduct a proper investigation into allegations of ill treatment. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 8:35 am
MP3 players, PCs, printers), with collected revenues then redistributed to rights holders by collecting societies. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 3:23 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Anson v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 27 October 2014. [read post]
21 May 2012, 4:54 am by INFORRM
On the same day there is an application concerning mode of trial in the case of Lewis v Commissioner of Police before Tugendhat J. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog)   Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
A New South Wales Supreme court judge ruled that Australian publishers are liable for defamatory comments on their Facebook sites. [read post]
31 Oct 2021, 5:45 pm by INFORRM
Journalists will be able to report much more detail about what they witness in England and Wales’s family courts under new plans to improve transparency. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 8:00 am
: (Spicy IP),Recent trends in IP strategy – an excerpt from London talk: (IP ThinkTank),World Customs Organisation recommends far-reaching new rules on IP: (Intellectual Property Watch),Members seek ways to move policy in WIPO Traditional Knowledge Committee: (Intellectual Property Watch)Global - Trade Marks / Domain Names / BrandsXerox – avoiding genericide: (Afro-IP),Big business urges adoption of Anti-Counterfeiting Treaty: (IP Justice),WIPO press release ‘Record… [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 3:40 am
" This morning the Court of Justice gave its ruling in Joined Cases C 446/09 Koninklijke Philips Electronics NV v Lucheng Meijing Industrial Company Ltd, Far East Sourcing Ltd, Röhlig Hong Kong Ltd, Röhlig Belgium NV and Nokia Corporation and and C 495/09 Nokia Corporation v Her Majesty’s Commissioners of Revenue and Customs, International Trademark Association intervening. [read post]