Search for: "Walker v. County of Los Angeles"
Results 21 - 40
of 60
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Dec 2014, 3:41 am
On Friday the Court issued the first set of orders from its December 5 Conference, granting cert. in three cases: Walker v. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 8:00 am
SC121764 (Cal., Los Angeles Co. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:04 pm
Walker, Dorothy M. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 5:20 pm
Even though Judge Walker has enjoined the Governor, the Attorney General, the State Registrar of Vital Statistics, and the County Clerk-Registrars of Alameda and Los Angeles Counties from applying Proposition 8, he has no ability to extend his injunction to the county clerks of each of California's 56 other counties. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 3:00 pm
The theory behind the state court maneuvers was that Judge Walker’s ruling only applied to the two same-sex couples who won the case before him, or, at most, to the two counties that those couples had sued in the case — Alameda and Los Angeles. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
This is most clear when it comes to the Clerks of Los Angeles and Alameda counties; Judge Walker’s order directs them, in broad terms, not to enforce Proposition 8. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 3:37 pm
Katami and Zarrillo are to be married in Los Angeles. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm
The two county clerks who were named as defendants in the action, the clerks of Los Angeles and Alameda counties, would also probably be content to issue marriage licenses to other same-sex couples in those counties. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm
Beyond that, there is also broad agreement that the two named same-sex couples in the Hollingsworth case who sought marriage licenses from the county clerks in Alameda and Los Angeles counties, respectively, should get their licenses. [read post]
11 Aug 2012, 6:52 pm
Kerner, who practices in Northridge, filed the suit in the Los Angeles County Superior Court against Aetna Health Plans of California Inc., Aetna U.S. [read post]
1 May 2012, 6:32 pm
Source: Sfgate, Los Angeles Times [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 2:41 pm
Walker All in all, 2011 reflected a significant year in terms of the sheer number of published appellate decisions. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 8:59 am
” (Waste Management of Alameda County , Inc. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 11:16 am
(City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 8:22 pm
None of the lawyers and none of the judges appeared to be doing anything differently from their usual m.o. 3) And now my main point: The plaintiffs are arguing on appeal that Judge Walker's ruling is narrow in scope, binding only on the California Governor, Attorney General, two other state officials, and the County Clerks of Alameda and Los Angeles counties. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 5:47 am
Boies is almost immediately interrupted and questioned about the scope of Judge Walker’s injunction – according to him, it affects the Gov/AG and the clerks for Los Angeles and Alameda County only. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 4:22 pm
Los Angeles Board of Education, a ruling that allowed a local school board to cut back on crosstown busing as a means of relieving racial segregation of public schools. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 4:20 pm
Walker v. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 2:14 pm
Even though Judge Walker has enjoined the Governor, the Attorney General, the State Registrar of Vital Statistics, and the County Clerk-Registrars of Alameda and Los Angeles Counties from applying Proposition 8, he has no ability to extend his injunction to the county clerks of each of California's 56 other counties. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 2:26 pm
Lujan v. [read post]
