Search for: "Walker v. King" Results 21 - 40 of 211
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Favors v Cuomo, 2012 WL 928223 *2, 2012 US Dist LEXIS 36910, *10 [ED NY, Mar. 19, 2012, No. 11-CV-5632, Raggi, Lynch, and Irizarry, JJ.]; Rodriguez v Pataki, 2002 WL 1058054, *7, 2002 US Dist LEXIS, *25-27 [SD NY 2002, May 24, 2002, No. 02 Civ. 618, Walker, Ch. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 2:32 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  2021 NY Slip Op 31728(U) May 17, 2021 Supreme Court, Kings County Docket Number: 516045/2020 Judge: Peter P. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 5:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
Table 1: Selected County and Municipal Rental Car Excise Taxes State Locality Car Rental Excise Tax  Funding Purpose Alaska Anchorage 8% City general fund Arizona Maricopa County (Phoenix) The greater of 3.25% or $2.50 per rental Glendale Stadium; youth & amateur sports Arizona Pima County (Tucson) $3.50 Kino Sports Complex Colorado Denver 7.25% Colorado Convention Center Georgia Atlanta 10% State Farm Arena Illinois Chicago 6% and 9% transaction tax (a) City general fund Indiana Marion… [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 11:34 am by Steve Gottlieb
As Martin Luther King put it, “The arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends toward justice”. [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
On the same day Nicol J heard an application in the case of Depp v News Group Newspapers. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 3:28 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Manno v Hayes Law Practice, PLLC  2020 NY Slip Op 31228(U)  May 6, 2020  Supreme Court, Kings County  Docket Number: Index No. 520104/16  Judge: Edgar G. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 10:22 am by Eric Goldman
Supreme Court ruling in MercExchange v. eBay, which dramatically clipped the legal tools available to patent trolls; Tiffany v. eBay, which redefined secondary trademark infringement online; Section 230’s applicability to online marketplaces (including the Stoner, Gentry, Hill, and Inman cases); and much more. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 8:57 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Maybe here too.Rob Walker: Using “WFH” in a contract creates an employment relationship in California. [read post]