Search for: "Wall v. Hodges" Results 21 - 40 of 78
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm by Ronald Collins
In the 20th volume, Erwin Chemerinsky, dean of the University of California, Berkeley School of Law, and Howard Gillman, chancellor of the University of California, Irvine, have written “The Religion Clauses: The Case for Separating Church and State,” which focuses on what the authors see as the troubling directions our conservative justices are now taking insofar as they reject the idea of a wall separating church and state. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 6:02 am by Howard Friedman
Alvare, Dialoguing with Paganism, (Journal of Catholic Legal Studies, Vol. 57, No. 1, pp. 57-61 (2019)).Nicholas Hunt, Let Us Pray: The Case for Legislator-Led Prayer, (Tulsa Law Review, Vol. 54, No. 49, 2018).Mannu Chowdhury, A Wall Between the 'Public' and the 'Private': A Comment on Highwood Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses (Judicial Committee) v Wall, (Western Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 9, No. 2, 2019).SpearIt, The Catholic Church Sex… [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 8:41 am by MATHILDE GROPPO
The Explanatory Notes refer to Thornton (cited above) and Jameel v The Wall Street Journal Europe Sprl [2003] EWCA Civ 1694. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
The Explanatory Notes refer to Thornton (cited above) and Jameel v The Wall Street Journal Europe Sprl [2003] EWCA Civ 1694. [read post]
8 Jul 2018, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
My opinion piece in Monday’s Wall Street Journal offers eight reasons why, no matter who is the next justice, the Supreme Court will not overturn Obergefell v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 10:25 am by Sionaidh Douglas-Scott
Hodges that the Constitution guarantees a right to same-sex marriage. [read post]
22 Apr 2018, 4:31 pm by INFORRM
Karl Hodge also has a post which considered how, if services are provided online to users for free, they payment made is usually in the form of personal data provided to the service provider. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 4:58 pm by Jamie Baker
Krahn, Constitutional Law: If These Walls Could Talk: Giving Undue Deference to Religious Actors by Expanding the Ecclesiastical Abstention Doctrine-Pfeil v. [read post]
28 Jul 2017, 3:54 am by SHG
The Seventh Circuit’s Hively decision cracked the wall of precedent that held sexual orientation was not covered by Title VII, though the argument is that the Supreme Court’s 1989 decision in Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
As already mentioned, on 24, 25 and 26 January 2017, the Supreme Court (Lords Neuberger, Mance, Sumption, Hughes and Hodge) heard the joined appeals in the cases of Flood v Times Newspapers, Miller v Associated Newspapers and Frost v MGN. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 5:17 am by ASAD KHAN
Indeed, JH (Zimbabwe) [2009] EWCA Civ 78 made much the same point and Wall and Laws LJJ agreed with Richards LJ’s reasoning which Elias LJ found equally impressive. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 1:30 am by Blog Editorial
Patrick Green refers to this as the “castle walls” argument (as opposed to the “Trojan Horse” argument). 14.09: Patrick Green QC wishes to investigate whether there was a relevant prerogative power at all and proper understanding of the legislation that follows 1972. [read post]