Search for: "Wallace v. Foster" Results 21 - 39 of 39
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jul 2012, 6:47 am by Nabiha Syed
Heller and McDonald v. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 5:40 pm
According to Jennifer Schuessler, writing in The New York Times Book Review, the obscurantism of this passage inspired the late novelist David Foster Wallace to write his just-published novel The Pale King. [read post]
2 Apr 2011, 4:02 am by pete.black@gmail.com (Peter Black)
These are some of the things I've been tweeting about today: john jeremiah sullivan reviews david foster wallace's last novel, "the pale king' ... [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 2:20 pm by Mary Whisner
Also, she does not follow in the footsteps of the late, great David Foster Wallace and use footnotes to mirror the fractured nature of reality in her work. [read post]
10 May 2010, 2:59 am
"Healing ourselves is the essence of democratic development. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 3:13 pm by SOIssues
The analysis in this case built on the Indiana Supreme Court's opinion last year in Wallace v. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 6:31 am
  The analysis in this case built on the Indiana Supreme Court’s opinion last year in Wallace v. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 8:45 am
So much for the enthusiastic efforts to implement recommendations of the Gowers Review, for support for the patent prosecution highway and for the government's deification of Wallace and Gromit]. [read post]
5 May 2009, 3:03 am
(The late, great David Foster Wallace explains why in this brilliant piece that takes a little while to download because it's a pretty big file but is completely worth it.) [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 1:19 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKAlternative Dispute Resolution Confirming Awards, Court Cites 'Wallace' in Ruling Defenses Untimely Under Federal Arbitration Act McCarthey Investments LLC v. [read post]
18 Jul 2007, 11:12 am by Damin J. Toell, Esq.
.'s blog, No-Fault Paradise, he's currently re-reading David Foster Wallace's 1996 novel 'Infinite Jest'. [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 9:08 pm
Allen, 392 U.S. 236, 243 (1968); finally, the statute must not foster "an excessive government entanglement with religion. [read post]