Search for: "Wardlaw v. United States"
Results 21 - 40
of 133
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jan 2018, 4:42 pm
(They'll feel good about themselves while serving their revocation sentences).United States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 5:51 pm
, United States v. [read post]
23 Nov 2017, 10:32 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 4:03 am
United States, which asks whether the government must obtain a warrant for cell-site-location information. [read post]
27 May 2017, 1:11 pm
” Id.at *2 (citing United States v. [read post]
21 May 2017, 9:36 am
Happily, the government now gets a second bite at the Brady apple.United States v. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 8:53 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Nov 2016, 2:20 pm
(Ninth indisposed).United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2016, 9:05 am
See United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 4:04 pm
United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 4:21 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 May 2016, 6:56 pm
Probably United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 12:56 pm
United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 8:57 am
Davis, No. 09-99005 (per curiam; panel is Reinhardt, Wardlaw, and Callahan) --- On remand from the United States Supreme Court, see Davis v. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 3:49 pm
United States District Court (In re United States), 791 F.3d 945 (9th Cir. 2015). [read post]
25 Oct 2015, 12:26 pm
Dimaya v. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 7:11 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 10:45 am
.)United States v. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 1:43 pm
United States V. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 1:32 pm
Rather than recite the facts of this extremely interesting case, I'll merely cut-and-paste the money quote from Judge Wardlaw's majority opinion (to which Judge Pregerson dissents):"Once again, an Assistant United States Attorney for the Southern District of California overstepped the boundaries of permissible questioning and argument. [read post]
