Search for: "Washington State Grange v. Washington State Republican Party"
Results 21 - 40
of 40
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2007, 8:18 am
Washington State Republican Party (06-713, and a companion case, 06-730), on the constitutionality of limits on party identification on primary election ballots; consolidated for 1 hour of argument. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 9:55 am
Washington State Republican Party and Crawford v. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 8:00 am
Washington State Republican Party (552 U.S. 442 (2008)), the Court applied the following test: “a facial challenge must fail where the statute has a ‘plainly legitimate sweep.’” [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 6:40 am
Planned Parenthood (a challenge to a New Hampshire parental notification law) and Washington State Grange (a challenge to Washington State’s regulation of primary election procedures). [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 2:34 am
Salerno, 481 U.S. 739, 745 (1987); see Washington State Grange v. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 6:03 am
In Washington State Grange v. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 7:04 am
Washington State Grange in 2012 approved of the burdens on minor-party candidates in Washington's top-two system, but emphasized that the "primary is in August, not March. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 8:00 am
” (187) Conclusions of Law Plaintiff’s Facial Challenge Citing Washington Grange v. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 10:53 am
Washington State Republican Party. [read post]
3 Mar 2007, 4:06 pm
Grants Washington State Grange v. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 11:12 am
Republican Party of Connecticut and Washington State Grange v. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 6:00 am
Washington State Republican Party. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 1:01 pm
Supreme Court, March 18, 2008 Washington State Grange v. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 12:13 pm
See Washington State Grange v. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 7:26 am
While Crawford doesn't close the door on facial challenges to election laws, it does continue the Court's inching toward as-applied challenges in these cases, also evident in its recent decision in Washington State Grange. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 9:33 pm
"); Washington State Grange v. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 4:36 pm
Texas 167 days 6-3 3; Roberts(m), Stevens(c), Breyer(d) Washington State Grange v. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 8:43 pm
Id., at 745.Washington State Grange v. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 8:43 pm
Id., at 745.Washington State Grange v. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 7:44 am
Question: In what may well be an unprecedented event in Supreme Court history, in his McCutcheon v. [read post]
