Search for: "Washington et al v. South Carolina, State of et al" Results 21 - 40 of 81
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Feb 2011, 3:56 pm by Lyle Denniston
  The case is Lebron, et al., v. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 4:08 am
The Louisiana Supreme Court, however, ruled on May 22 that the Supreme Court's 1977 decision barring capital punishment for rape (Coker v. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 4:09 am by Bill Marler
Products are being removed from New World, Pak’n Save and Four Square shops nationwide, and from Trents and Raeward Fresh stores in the South Island. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 11:52 am by Marty Lederman
 The stark differences between this supposed “offer” to the States and the long-recognized models of federal-state cooperation—namely, conditional grant programs and federal laws permitting state implementation with a federal fallback—are discussed in detail in Part III of the amicus brief filed by Professors Merrill, et al. 2. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 8:12 am by Anna Christensen
Opinion below (Supreme Court of South Carolina) Petition for certiorari Amicus brief of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, et al. [read post]
17 May 2010, 5:49 am by Lawrence Solum
At about 12:40 p.m., Chief Justice Warren began to read his opinion for the Court in Case Number One on that Term’s docket, Oliver Brown et al. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
For example, some of the more noteworthy books by Justices concern the Civil War, such as the following: Salmon Portland Chase, How the South Rejected Compromise in the Peace Conference of 1861 (1863) John Archibald Campbell, Reminiscences and Documents Relating to the Civil War During the Year 1865 (1887) William O. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 2:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
New York is followed by California (43.4 percent of consumption smuggled), Washington (42.6 percent), New Mexico (37.2 percent), and Minnesota (35.2 percent). [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 11:06 pm by Daniel Low
Valassis also alleged state law tortious interference, and violations of state unfair competition laws under the laws of California, Connecticut, Nebraska, North Carolina, South Carolina, Utah, and Washington. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 9:15 am by Anna Christensen
Amicus brief for the Center for Family Policy and Practice, et al.Amicus brief of the Constitution ProjectBrief of South Carolina Department of Social Services in oppositionBrief of Rebecca Price in oppositionPetitioner's reply Title: Archstone Multifamily Series I Trust v. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 1:38 pm by Doug Cornelius
Ky. 2012) (purchases of properties in Kentucky and South Carolina); United States v. [read post]