Search for: "Washington v. Emery" Results 21 - 40 of 42
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2023, 6:30 am
Fich (Drexel University), Jarrad Harford (University of Washington), and Anh L. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 6:30 am
Fich (Drexel University), Jarrad Harford (University of Washington), and Anh L. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 9:12 pm by David Lat
Davis both expect that 3M’s latest lawsuit in Washington D.C. will fail, just as its prior two efforts failed in the New York court.3M Company v. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 6:10 am
Endogenous Legal Traditions and Economic Outcomes Posted by Carmine Guerriero, University of Amsterdam, on Friday, April 22, 2016 Tags: Diversity, Efficiency, Financial Regulation, Globalization, International governance, Labor markets, Legal systems,Market efficiency, Social policies, Stakeholders Dieckman v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am by INFORRM
IPSO 18075-23 Singh v The Sunday Times, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 18301-23 Taylor v The Herald on Sunday, 1 Accuracy 2021, Breach – sanction: publication of correction 19677-23 A complainant v The Daily Telegraph, 3 Harassment (2021), 12 Discrimination (2021), 2 Privacy (2021), 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 19741-23 Dikme v eveningnews24.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction: publication… [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 9:11 pm by Lyle Denniston
 Burchfield of the Washington law firm of McDermott Will & Emery, with ten minutes. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 2:37 pm by Adam Thierer
The Washington Post recently noted that, “The Postal Service is on course to lose more than $7 billion this year, despite substantial recent cost-cutting, and it could lose more than $238 billion by 2020. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 6:00 pm
Signature Financial Group, Inc., and AT&T Corp. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
(IPKat) German Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) guidance regarding registrability of 'spa' in relation to beauty care products and spa services (Class 46)   Europe ARMAFOAM: the ECJ rules on linguistic and changes OHIM's rules on conversion: Armacell v OHIM (CATCH US IF YOU CAN !!!) [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 10:19 am by John Steele
  From the Washington Post obit: "At Covington & Burling and across Washington’s legal community, Mr. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
– discussion of Washington Post article on Ismed’s efforts to promote follow-on biologics approval pathway: (Patent Baristas), (Patent Docs), US: Congressional fact-finding on follow-on biologics: (Patent Docs), US: David v Monsanto: Biotechnology patent ‘exhaustion’ after Quanta, Supreme Court petition: (Hal Wegner), US: Ulysses Pharmaceuticals announces issuance of patent for novel class of ant [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 9:20 am
UPDATE:  The California Supreme Court's decision in Rico v. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 10:45 pm by José Guillermo
La estrategia que guía Foro Democrático todavía operativo hoy, fue presentada por Sagasti, en un seminario de dos días en Woodrow Wilson de Washington, D.C. [read post]