Search for: "Washington v. Emery" Results 21 - 40 of 42
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Dec 2011, 10:19 am by John Steele
  From the Washington Post obit: "At Covington & Burling and across Washington’s legal community, Mr. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 4:17 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Sealander and Erika Stocker of McDermott Will & Emery on the firm's blog, Health Care Law Reform Financial Times Reports That SEC Has Written At Least Dozen Companies About Their Business Dealings in Countries Deemed "State Sponsors" of Terror - Washington, DC attorney William McGrath of Porter Wright on the firm's Federal Securities Law Blog Louisiana Supreme Court Follows Wal-Mart v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 9:12 pm by David Lat
Davis both expect that 3M’s latest lawsuit in Washington D.C. will fail, just as its prior two efforts failed in the New York court.3M Company v. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 5:00 am
Defendant essentially consented to officers following him into his home to get clothes after he was arrested, but it was permissible under Washington v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 2:17 pm by Aaron Pelley
Courtesy of Law Offices of Dena Alo-Colbeck “Writing and Research for Washington Attorneys” The following criminal cases of note were decided this week: Washington State Law Division One Court of Appeals State v. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 4:42 pm by Colin O'Keefe
- Boise attorney Chuck Peterson on Peterson Law Offices' Idaho Criminal Defense Blog David v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 2:37 pm by Adam Thierer
The Washington Post recently noted that, “The Postal Service is on course to lose more than $7 billion this year, despite substantial recent cost-cutting, and it could lose more than $238 billion by 2020. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 3:00 am
Miller  Baker of McDermott Will & Emery in Washington, DC will argue for the petitioners. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
(IPKat) German Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) guidance regarding registrability of 'spa' in relation to beauty care products and spa services (Class 46)   Europe ARMAFOAM: the ECJ rules on linguistic and changes OHIM's rules on conversion: Armacell v OHIM (CATCH US IF YOU CAN !!!) [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
– discussion of Washington Post article on Ismed’s efforts to promote follow-on biologics approval pathway: (Patent Baristas), (Patent Docs), US: Congressional fact-finding on follow-on biologics: (Patent Docs), US: David v Monsanto: Biotechnology patent ‘exhaustion’ after Quanta, Supreme Court petition: (Hal Wegner), US: Ulysses Pharmaceuticals announces issuance of patent for novel class of ant [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 1:53 pm
On March 18, 2008, the Court decided the case of Washington State Grange v. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 6:00 pm
Signature Financial Group, Inc., and AT&T Corp. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 9:20 am
UPDATE:  The California Supreme Court's decision in Rico v. [read post]