Search for: "Washington v. Preferred Communication Systems, Inc." Results 21 - 40 of 81
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by David Kris
  Developing such international agreements will be challenging, but the alternative is an increasingly chaotic and dysfunctional system for cross-border data requests that benefits no one. [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 7:55 am
Patent No. 5,958,006),  a system for communicating user-selected criteria filter between wireless client and server, (U.S. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 4:01 am by Administrator
Public.Resource.Org, Inc. 2020) and a law introduced in 2019 in France which prohibits the publication of statistical analysis of court decisions (Légifrance 2019). [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 8:01 am by William Ford, Victoria Gallegos
Mike Nagata, senior vice president of CACI International Inc.; retired Lt. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 5:21 am
(Ars Technica)   New Zealand NZ releases consultation on revised three strikes proposal (Michael Geist) (Ars Technica) (TorrentFreak)   Nigeria 2 Face Idibia sheds light on music industry in Nigeria (Afro-IP)   Norway Pirate Bay block violates democratic principles, says Norway’s largest ISP Telenor (TorrentFreak)   Spain Domain name ‘seguridadsocial.es’ finds its (secure) way home (Class 46)   Sweden Pirate Bay… [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 6:45 am
(ITC 337 Law Blog) GOOD magazine article on Erich Spangenberg: The ethics of patent trolling (The Prior Art)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC to hear claim and continuation rule case en banc; litigation schedule set: Tafas v Doll (Filewrapper) (Patent Docs) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (IP Watchdog) (Inventive Step) (IP Spotlight) (Gray on Claims) (Managing Intellectual Property) (Inventive Step) CAFC: Properly construed claims failed to read on… [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am by Ben
More from Europe: In Case C-355/12 Nintendo v PC Box the CJEU said that circumventing a protection system may not be unlawful. [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 10:57 pm by Mahmoud Khatib
This includes courts in California, Delaware, Illinois, New York, and Washington.[26] To determine which category a letter of intent falls under, courts examine the intentions of the parties.[27] In fact, the primary factor of all letter of intent analysis is the intentions of the parties.[28] Intent is the “touchstone” upon which letter of intent litigation hinges.[29] C. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 7:02 am
The Supreme Court on Monday agreed to hear an appeal by the Federal Communications Commission testing its power to ban even a single use of a vulgar word on radio and television (FCC v. [read post]
ShareNearly 100 amicus briefs were filed in Students for Fair Admissions v. the University of North Carolina and Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 1:21 pm by Behr, McCarter & Potter, P.C.
“It has long been the rule in Missouri that on cross-examination, a witness may be asked any questions which tend to test his accuracy, veracity or credibility…” Sandy Ford Ranch, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 9:22 am by David Kopel
Baby Girl, 570 U.S. 637, 658-65 (2013); and in his dissent from denial of certiorari in Upstate Citizens for Equality, Inc v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 10:44 am by Chris Castle
Hesse appears to be the thought leader behind imposing 100% licensing on the songwriter community. [read post]
6 Dec 2020, 4:45 pm by INFORRM
Granting victims and the press greater access to the parole board system will greatly enhance public scrutiny and confidence in the justice system, the Society of Editors has said. [read post]