Search for: "Waters v. City of Birmingham" Results 21 - 40 of 45
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jan 2015, 6:28 pm
It had its legal beginning in 1896, when the Supreme Court rendered a decision known as the Plessy v. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 12:23 pm by Giles Peaker
  Southwark LBC v Munu &Munu Mayors and City of London County Court 16 May 2012 Disrepair counterclaim. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 12:23 pm by Giles Peaker
  Southwark LBC v Munu &Munu Mayors and City of London County Court 16 May 2012 Disrepair counterclaim. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 3:43 pm by Giles Peaker
Birmingham City Council v Balog [2013] EWCA Civ 1582A s.202 review decision on affordability was at the centre of this second appeal, brought by Birmingham after a s.204 appeal decision went against them. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 3:43 pm by Giles Peaker
Birmingham City Council v Balog [2013] EWCA Civ 1582A s.202 review decision on affordability was at the centre of this second appeal, brought by Birmingham after a s.204 appeal decision went against them. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 2:05 pm by NL
There were two shared bathrooms for 13 people and most of the time Mr A was there, only one had hot water. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 2:05 pm by NL
There were two shared bathrooms for 13 people and most of the time Mr A was there, only one had hot water. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 3:12 pm by Susan I. Nelson
 Testimony given in Birmingham, Ala. in the Birmingham City Council Chambers. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 9:50 am by Josh Wright
” Comtel Air passengers on a Tuesday flight to Birmingham, England, from the Indian city of Amritsar were hit up for 130 pounds — about $200 each — during a layover in Vienna. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 7:43 am by PRATER, DUNCAN & CRAIG 770-253-7778
, Huie, Fernambucq & Stewart LLP, Birmingham, Ala. 14 $124,546,733 Motor Vehicle Pacheco v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am by chief
These were resisted by the then government on the basis that they would be watering down the effects of DTs and "would effectively require a double possession hearing". [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am by chief
These were resisted by the then government on the basis that they would be watering down the effects of DTs and "would effectively require a double possession hearing". [read post]
29 Aug 2010, 8:29 am
On August 27, 2010, the Court of Civil Appeals released their opinion in the Water Works Board of the City of Birmingham v. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:59 am by Tom Goldstein
Supreme Court retirements inevitably produce much more coverage of process than substance. [read post]