Search for: "Watford v. House"
Results 21 - 30
of 30
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Oct 2016, 7:46 am
In a separate concurring opinion, Judge Watford suggested the matter was “open to debate” but that it would not be “prudent for us to create a circuit split” under the circumstances here (Ziober v. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 7:53 am
Global Horizons, Inc., dba Global Horizons Manpower, Inc., February 6, 2019, Watford, P.). [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 5:01 am
In State v. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 1:17 pm
" Woodford v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 6:45 pm
Municipal Court and See v. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 5:23 pm
DiRuzza v. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 4:26 am
In Lathus v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 7:28 am
Further, in Watford v. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 8:11 am
Dissenting, Judge Gibbons would have found, as a matter of law, that staying a grievance when an employee files an EEOC charge or discrimination lawsuit does not constitute retaliation under Title VII or the ADEA (Watford v. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 5:57 am
The Washington Supreme Court, in a case examining the similarly-worded telephone-harassment statute, has defined “intimidate” to include “compel[ling] to action or inaction (as by threats),” Seattle v. [read post]
