Search for: "Watkins v. Smith" Results 21 - 40 of 57
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2012, 10:34 pm by Jeff Gamso
I have occasionally on this blog taken the opportunity to praise a prosecutor for exemplifying the role eloquently described by Justice Sutherland in Berger v. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 3:40 am by Edith Roberts
At the Competitive Enterprise Institute blog, Devin Watkins suggests that after last week’s oral argument in Kisor v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 11:56 am by Lyle Denniston
Garre, now chair of the appellate practice at Latham & Watkins, in Washington. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 8:14 am by Francis Davey
Balthasar v Mullane was followed by the Court of Appeal again in Adams v Watkins (1990) 22 H.L.R. 107. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
As I explained in one of my earlier posts, several or all of the Justices might be inclined to decide the case on some ground that doesn’t require the Court to decide whether Donald Trump is eligible to be President, if such an “off-ramp” solution is legally available. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 5:57 am
Smith (1990), which says, “The government may not compel affirmation of religious belief, see Torcaso v. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 5:12 am
The second in the guest series of Brave New World posts written by Don McCombie (Latham & Watkins) for PatLit deals with jurisdiction and the Unified Patent Court. [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 4:50 pm by INFORRM
The Guardian has a report on the evidence of Assistant Defence Minister Andrew Hastie at the defamation trial of Ben Roberts-Smith. [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 8:00 am by INFORRM
On 30 March 2022 there was an application in the case of Watkins -v- Mackle. [read post]
22 Feb 2009, 4:25 pm
No. 22550, 2008-Ohio-3873 (petition for writ of prohibition dismissed) In re: State of Ohio, ex rel., Daniel Watkins II, 2nd Dist. [read post]
27 Jun 2021, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
ABC News had an article “There are two versions of the facts at Ben Roberts-Smith’s defamation trial. [read post]