Search for: "Watson v. Bear"
Results 21 - 40
of 118
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2022, 3:01 am
These cases bear on two pressing questions. [read post]
6 Jan 2022, 5:36 am
” Juen v. [read post]
24 Jul 2021, 11:51 am
In an 1838 case, Buddington v. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 5:55 am
Table of Contents Key Findings Introduction Review of State and Local Car Rental Excise Taxes — How Rental Car Taxes and Fees Work — How Rental Car Excise Tax Revenue Is Used Economic and Tax Policy Consequences of Rental Car Excise Taxes — Economic Incidence of Car Rental Excise Taxes — Tax Exporting — Car Rental Excise Taxes and Tax Policy Rental Car Taxes and Peer-to-Peer Car Sharing — Developments in the State Taxation of Peer-to-Peer Car Sharing —… [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 9:03 pm
” Walters highlighted that in Gundy v. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 10:24 am
Counsel for WFS was Paul Henton (instructed by Reed Smith) and counsel for Carnival/P&O were John Kimbell QC and Celine Honey (instructed by Watson Farley & Williams). [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 9:47 am
The landmark Supreme Court ruling Roe v. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 6:01 am
“[J]ust as Westlaw devised it to be, this ongoing suit has been heavy for ROSS to bear,” today’s statement said. [read post]
24 Oct 2020, 3:42 pm
And therefore, to set a path towards defining virtue, and applying rules to advance it, that incorporates Christian understanding of human weakness (though bearing in mind that is not the same thing as human guilt).[27] And so the “privacy paradox,”[28] for example, is less a product of technology than a product of human nature. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 4:28 pm
Questions in Issue The two questions referred were: whether the activities of the SIAs fall within the scope of EU law bearing in mind Art 4 TEU and Art 1(3) of Directive 2002/58 (ePrivacy Directive); if the answer is that the situation falls within EU law, do any of the “Watson Requirements” (as above) (or any other requirements) apply? [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 9:17 am
In determining the level of protection the GDPR requires, the Court re-iterated its stance from Schrems I and following the reasoning of its Advocate General in this case held that we are looking for a level of protection “essentially equivalent” to that in the EU- and bearing in mind that the GDPR is understood in the light of the EU Charter. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 3:00 pm
See, e.g., Watson v. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 12:00 am
See, e.g., Watson v. [read post]
27 Dec 2019, 7:55 am
” This overbroad formulation is a far cry from the definition set forth by the Supreme Court in Davis v. [read post]
22 Sep 2019, 7:55 am
A: An "inventory" search.United States v. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 4:00 am
“[It] bears all the trappings of an official, state-run account. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 12:34 pm
” Watson v. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 4:50 am
The Bulk Powers Review reveals the extent to which more sophisticated analytical techniques such as anomaly detection and pattern analysis are brought to bear on intercepted material, particul [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 1:20 am
”[12] Shareholders bear the brunt of these abuses; “[i]nvestors always are the ultimate losers when extortionate ‘settlements’ are extracted from issuers. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 7:00 am
The latest craze is fake sex videos featuring celebrities like Gal Gadot and Emma Watson. [read post]
