Search for: "Way v. Lucas*"
Results 21 - 40
of 56
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2015, 8:09 am
[W]hat WPMC are presenting amounts to a package of the [c]oncert [v]ideo with additional material. [read post]
31 May 2015, 5:02 am
If 3D printing is the disruptive technology some claim it to be, in what way does it or will it disrupt IP law in the way that Lipson and Kurman predict in their forecast that "intellectual property law will be brought to its knees", as quoted in the Introduction to Study I? [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 4:03 pm
- Impostores y posmodernos: el caso Sokal vía @Naukas_com- Five ways in which Twitter can be useful in academic contexts de @raulpacheco (que nos llega via el amigo @healeyparera)- 25 monumentos abandonados de la Ex-Yugoslavia que parecen del futuro (y tal vez, en verdad, lo sean).- How PowerPoint is ruining Higher Ed, explained in one PowerPoint. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 12:20 pm
Then Buffy v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 8:15 am
Top 5 Ways to Help Ensure Your Business has Click-Wrap Agreements that Work: | Handy! [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 11:03 am
But access is now potentially on both sides of the equation, not just incentives v. access. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 12:55 pm
Topics to be touched upon include the effect of the Supreme Court decision in Lucasfilms v Ainsworth, whether barristers should ditch their wigs in favour of the rather more egalitarian headgear illustrated on the right, and lots more besides. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 11:07 am
Our Costa Mesa wage and hour attorneys understand that the plaintiffs in Frlekin et al v. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 4:33 am
” — from Employment Discrimination Report Bad “Business Judgment” is not Discrimination – Veronese v. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 12:38 pm
Golan v. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 8:43 am
And now, here is a legal first, straight from the pen (well, keyboard) of our Mr Justice Arnold in joined cases Actavis Group hf v Eli Lilly & Company (USA)/Medis ehf v Eli Lilly & Company (USA) [2012] EWHC 3316 (Pat) on whether the English Courts have jurisdiction over issues of infringement of foreign-designated patents. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 12:54 pm
For example, in Nichols v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 10:18 am
Americans v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 3:35 am
Last week, in State v. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 7:21 am
In its second intellectual property appeal (the first being Lucasfilm v Ainsworth [2011] UKSC 39 see my case note "Lucasfilm v Ansoworth The Supreme Court's First IP Appeal" 31 July 2011 IP/IT Update) the United Kingdom Supreme Court had to consider the way in which the requirement of industrial applicability extends to a patent for biological material. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 8:55 am
Devolution issues The background to the case is that the UK Supreme Court (as a result of the powers it inherited from the Privy Council by way of the Constitutional Reform Act 2005) has a limited jurisdiction to hear Scottish appeals that raise devolution issues. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 8:55 am
Devolution issues The background to the case is that the UK Supreme Court (as a result of the powers it inherited from the Privy Council by way of the Constitutional Reform Act 2005) has a limited jurisdiction to hear Scottish appeals that raise devolution issues. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 5:39 pm
Hackett v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 12:47 am
The protection of certain rights had, to a certain extent, to give way to security concerns. [read post]
