Search for: "Weeks v. State of Mich."
Results 21 - 40
of 312
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Aug 2007, 3:24 pm
United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2007, 10:18 am
People v. [read post]
20 Mar 2010, 1:34 pm
(See Hensman v. [read post]
20 Sep 2009, 9:23 am
In the well-known 1987 divorce case of Atkinson v Atkinson, the Court of Appeals established the following test for application of the doctrine:[W]e adopt the doctrine of equitable parent and find that a husband who is not the biological father of a child born or conceived during the marriage may be considered the natural father of that child where (1) the husband and the child mutually acknowledge a relationship as father and child, or the mother of the child has cooperated in the… [read post]
20 Sep 2009, 9:23 am
In the well-known 1987 divorce case of Atkinson v Atkinson, the Court of Appeals established the following test for application of the doctrine:[W]e adopt the doctrine of equitable parent and find that a husband who is not the biological father of a child born or conceived during the marriage may be considered the natural father of that child where (1) the husband and the child mutually acknowledge a relationship as father and child, or the mother of the child has cooperated in the… [read post]
20 Sep 2009, 8:33 am
In the well-known 1987 divorce case of Atkinson v Atkinson, the Court of Appeals established the following test for application of the doctrine:[W]e adopt the doctrine of equitable parent and find that a husband who is not the biological father of a child born or conceived during the marriage may be considered the natural father of that child where (1) the husband and the child mutually acknowledge a relationship as father and child, or the mother of the child has cooperated in the… [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 3:27 am
The Wisconsin court of appeals last week affirmed the dismissal of a plaintiff's medical monitoring complaint for failure to state a claim. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 5:24 am
This week, Cybercrime Review is featuring a series of posts that takes a look at how federal and state courts are applying the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 7:26 am
Courts of Appeals for the Second Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am
As we said last week, because it’s a Dechert case, we can’t comment directly on Clark v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 8:16 am
The discussion of the American flag case reminded me of a much less noticed decision from a few weeks ago, Agema v. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 12:52 pm
This week, in Rogers v Wcisel, __ Mich App__; __ NW __ (2015), slip op, the Court of Appeals addressed in a published opinion what it means under the Revocation of Paternity Act (RPA) for there to be a "mistake of fact" justifying a revocation of an acknowledgement of paternity. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 5:17 am
Mich. 2010) Virginia v. [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 7:40 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 6:23 pm
Supreme Court, in its divided 5-4 decision in United States v. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 7:26 am
Mich.) [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 1:29 pm
Mich. [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 2:12 pm
Harper, No. 130988 (Mich. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 5:28 am
Reese, 491 Mich. 127, 815 NW2d 85 (Michigan Supreme Court 2012); People v. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 11:10 pm
Mich. 2010) and Virginia v. [read post]
