Search for: "Weeks v. State of Mich." Results 21 - 40 of 311
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Sep 2009, 9:23 am by Timothy P. Flynn
  In the well-known 1987 divorce case of Atkinson v Atkinson, the Court of Appeals established the following test for application of the doctrine:[W]e adopt the doctrine of equitable parent and find that a husband who is not the biological father of a child born or conceived during the marriage may be considered the natural father of that child where (1) the husband and the child mutually acknowledge a relationship as father and child, or the mother of the child has cooperated in the… [read post]
20 Sep 2009, 9:23 am by Timothy P. Flynn
  In the well-known 1987 divorce case of Atkinson v Atkinson, the Court of Appeals established the following test for application of the doctrine:[W]e adopt the doctrine of equitable parent and find that a husband who is not the biological father of a child born or conceived during the marriage may be considered the natural father of that child where (1) the husband and the child mutually acknowledge a relationship as father and child, or the mother of the child has cooperated in the… [read post]
20 Sep 2009, 8:33 am by Timothy P. Flynn, Esq.
  In the well-known 1987 divorce case of Atkinson v Atkinson, the Court of Appeals established the following test for application of the doctrine:[W]e adopt the doctrine of equitable parent and find that a husband who is not the biological father of a child born or conceived during the marriage may be considered the natural father of that child where (1) the husband and the child mutually acknowledge a relationship as father and child, or the mother of the child has cooperated in the… [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 3:27 am by Sean Wajert
The Wisconsin court of appeals last week affirmed the dismissal of a plaintiff's medical monitoring complaint for failure to state a claim. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 5:24 am by Jeffrey Brown
This week, Cybercrime Review is featuring a series of posts that takes a look at how federal and state courts are applying the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 7:26 am by Hannah Kris
Courts of Appeals for the Second Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am by Beck, et al.
As we said last week, because it’s a Dechert case, we can’t comment directly on Clark v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 8:16 am
The discussion of the American flag case reminded me of a much less noticed decision from a few weeks ago, Agema v. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 12:52 pm by Megen Miller
This week, in Rogers v Wcisel, __ Mich App__; __ NW __ (2015), slip op, the Court of Appeals addressed in a published opinion what it means under the Revocation of Paternity Act (RPA) for there to be a "mistake of fact" justifying a revocation of an acknowledgement of paternity. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 5:28 am
Reese, 491 Mich. 127, 815 NW2d 85 (Michigan Supreme Court 2012); People v. [read post]