Search for: "Weeks v. Workforce Safety & Insurance"
Results 21 - 40
of 58
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Oct 2020, 3:31 pm
This may require security officers to remain on the premises and on call during paid rest periods, and to carry and monitor a communication device… it is the intent of the Legislature to abrogate, for the security services industry only, the California Supreme Court’s decision in Augustus v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 12:24 pm
However, if the borrower were to significantly reduce its workforce or reduce salaries [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 8:22 am
Supreme Court’s 1905 decision in Jacobson v. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 2:56 pm
Individuals who are taking or plan to take maternity leave must take at least two weeks off work (or four weeks if they work in a factory) immediately following the birth of their baby for health and safety reasons. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 1:48 pm
That said, the Delaware Supreme Court’s decision in Marchand v. [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 10:49 am
The New Jersey Department of Labor and Workforce Development issued a $649 million fine to Uber for unpaid unemployment and disability insurance taxes, which Uber is challenging. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 7:21 am
Assn. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 4:28 pm
See, e.g., Weidner v. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 9:17 am
Long before the elections of 2016, the American Republic had been moving toward more formal and open hostilities in the cultural civil war, one with social, economic, cultural and political consequences, that was one of the great consequences of the immediate post 1945 period. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 9:02 am
Pix: Texwinca Holdings LtdOn 6 June 2018, the Council on Ethics recommended to exclude the company Texwinca Holdings Ltd from the Government Pension Fund due to an unacceptable risk of the company being responsible for systematic human rights violations.Texwinca is a Chinese company that produces yarn, knitted fabrics and garments. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 8:56 am
” Walling v. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 7:41 am
In Texas v. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 10:56 am
In its ruling in Mount Lemmon Fire District v. [read post]
26 Aug 2018, 3:51 pm
McCarthy v. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 2:37 pm
Harris Funeral Homes, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 7:01 pm
One of the most frequently violated and litigated federal employment laws, the FLSA generally requires that U.S. employers pay nonexempt employees at least $7.25 per hour for all regular compensable hours worked, plus time and one-half their regular rates, including commissions, bonuses and incentive pay, for hours worked beyond 40 per week. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 7:35 am
That means that longstanding precedent, such as Roe v. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 1:54 pm
Affects Sections 2655, 3303, and 2655.1 of the Unemployment Insurance Code. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 9:42 pm
In Perez v. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 8:46 pm
It generally will cover jobs typically performed on call 24 hours per day, 7 days per week. [read post]
