Search for: "Weintraub v Weintraub" Results 21 - 40 of 166
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Oct 2022, 8:19 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The part-and-parcel language derives from a Second Circuit ruling, Weintraub v. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 4:50 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
However, the violation of a disciplinary rule or ethical obligations does not, without more, generate a cause of action for legal malpractice (Guiles v Simser, 35 AD3d 1054, 1056 [2006]; Weintraub v Phillips, Nizer, Benjamin, Krim, & Ballon, 172 AD2d 254 [1991]). [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 5:45 pm by Scott Hervey and Josh H. Escovedo
In this episode of The Briefing by the IP Law Blog, Weintraub attorneys Scott Hervey and Josh Escovedo discuss the impact of Alexis Hunley, et al v. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
” The rebuke prompted Democratic Commissioner Ellen Weintraub to lambaste Trainor in a series of tweets that referenced “The Handmaid’s Tale. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 4:57 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In an order dated December 10, 2019, the Supreme Court, inter alia, granted that branch of the defendant’s motion which was pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7) to dismiss the complaint on the ground that the defendant’s filing of ethics complaints was absolutely privileged (see Wiener v Weintraub, 22 NY2d 330, 331-332). [read post]
9 May 2022, 3:16 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
However, the violation of a disciplinary rule or ethical obligations does not, without more, generate a cause of action for legal malpractice (Guiles v Sismer 35 AD3d 1054, 1056; Weintraub v Phillips, Nizer, Benjamin, Krim & Ballon 172 AD2d 254). [read post]
20 Apr 2022, 12:13 pm by George Ticoras, Esq.
In prior cases premised on similar facts, the FEC could not agree whether, following the Citizens United and SpeechNow.org v. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 5:43 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Supreme Court dismisses the claim in All Vision LLC v Paduano & Weintraub LLP  2022 NY Slip Op 30464(U) February 9, 2022 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 653605/2021 Judge: Andrew Borrok finding that Federal Court considered the gist of the documents even absent the actual paper version of either of them. [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 10:00 am by Scott Hervey
  Watch this episode on the Weintraub YouTube channel, here. [read post]