Search for: "Wells v. Abercrombie "
Results 21 - 40
of 150
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2015, 10:41 am
In its much anticipated decision in Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 5:14 am
On Monday the Court issued its decision in EEOC v. [read post]
21 Apr 2013, 11:25 am
Abercrombie, 2013 U.S. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 10:15 pm
Abercrombie & Fitch, et al, 6:10cv111 / PACid v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 2:45 am
Abercrombie & Fitch Trading Co. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2011, 3:07 pm
Last June, in McDonald v. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 4:30 pm
This was the question posed to the SCOTUS at yesterday's oral argument in the case of EEOC v Abercrombie & Fitch. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 5:21 pm
Auth. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 10:20 am
(The court resisted saying that Abercrombie could never be applied to a non-word mark, however.)Instead, the court applied the distinctiveness test from Seabrook Foods, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 12:45 pm
Abercrombie & Fitch, 265 F.3d 994 (9th Cir. 2001) (use in ads suggesting endorsement of clothing seller); Brown v. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 9:30 pm
* Abercrombie v. [read post]
5 Oct 2014, 11:02 am
Abercrombie, 2014 U.S. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 10:33 am
The case was Hamm v. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 4:12 pm
But the Court's latest pronouncement on Title VII religious accommodation in the EEOC v. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 4:40 am
Last year, I blogged about EEOC v. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 6:49 pm
Let’s talk about EEOC v. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 3:13 am
The February sitting is now well underway. [read post]
25 Dec 2010, 4:41 am
And the case of United States v. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 6:37 am
In EEOC v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 8:39 am
In Levi Strauss & Co. v. [read post]
