Search for: "Wells v. Municipal Court (1981)"
Results 21 - 40
of 95
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Sep 2017, 4:54 am
” O’Brien v Syracuse, 54 NY2d 353, 357 (1981). [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am
Ramos v. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 9:43 pm
Accordingly, plaintiff’s § 1981 claims were also dismissed. [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 7:06 am
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31 is the fourth case since 2012 in which Abood v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Inst. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 5:36 am
Goethel v. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 5:53 am
Ephraim, 452 U.S. 61 (1981), and the ban on firing ranges that the Seventh Circuit struck down in Ezell v. [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 3:56 pm
The UK Supreme Court’s decision in R (on the application of Miller) v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 9:12 am
Div. 1984) (“It is well[-]settled that the law favors visitation. . . . [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 7:00 am
The trial court granted summary judgment to the officers on the no-proximate-cause rule formulated in Lewis v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 5:50 am
Here are the questions I've put together for teaching The Health Care Cases, NFIB v. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 5:43 pm
Georgia (1972) 408 U.S. 238, until rendered moot by the California Supreme Court decision in People v. [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 8:13 pm
Corporation of the Township of Vespra, 1981 CanLII 59 (SCC), [1981] 2 S.C.R. 145; Brosseau v. [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 8:17 pm
Thus, courts in recent years have simply taken the McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 12:05 pm
The nominally private charter or status of the entities in question is not determinative, however (see Smith, 92 NY2d at 713-716; Holden v Board of Trustees of Cornell Univ., 80 AD2d 378, 380-381 [3d Dept 1981]). [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 9:25 am
The Journey 4 Justice members were found guilty by the Topeka Municipal Court but are now appealing to the Topeka District Court, where they will get a new trial. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
At the outset, this Court notes that the advisory opinions of the Committee on Open Government (which were inconsistent here and upon which both sides thus rely to various extents) are “neither binding upon the agency nor entitled to greater deference in an article 78 proceeding than is the construction of the agency” itself (John P. v Whalen, 54 NY2d 89, 96 [1981]; see Buffalo News v Buffalo Enter. [read post]
10 Sep 2007, 10:39 am
Cal. 1978), aff'd on other grounds, 651 F.2d 1306, 1309 n.7 (9th Cir. 1981) ("If the Supremacy Clause is to be effective in achieving its purpose, its dictates must be enforceable by political subdivisions of states as well as by individuals"). [read post]
11 May 2015, 8:22 am
The federal trial court decision two weeks ago in Ballentine v. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 9:20 am
In making such a determination, a court must balance the nature of ownership as well as the ability to pass along the cost of liability. [read post]
