Search for: "Wells v. Park" Results 21 - 40 of 5,409
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The court applied the correct standard that, to be compensable under the WCL, an injury must have arisen "out of and in the course of a [worker's] employment" and that under WCL § 21 (1), an injury that arose in the course of employment is presumed to have arisen out of employment as well (id. [read post]
23 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The court applied the correct standard that, to be compensable under the WCL, an injury must have arisen "out of and in the course of a [worker's] employment" and that under WCL § 21 (1), an injury that arose in the course of employment is presumed to have arisen out of employment as well (id. [read post]
23 May 2024, 3:00 am by Yosi Yahoudai
Most security guards make little more than minimum wage versus well over $100,000 a year plus government benefits for experienced cops. [read post]
19 May 2024, 10:13 pm by INFORRM
The show’s popularity, as well as the promise of veracity, led to the alleged stalker being outed as a Scottish woman named Fiona Harvey. [read post]
17 May 2024, 1:07 pm by John Ross
If you call 911 to report you have taken hostages and already killed two of them, and then confront the police while holding a machete, that is probably not going to end well. [read post]
13 May 2024, 12:57 am by INFORRM
 The Mail has also agreed to pay substantial libel damages, which Mr Vince has indicated that he intends to donate to charity, as well as legal costs. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:16 pm by Michael Douglas
  Roder Zelt-Und Hallenkonstruktionen GmbH v Rosedown Park Pty Ltd – Australia’s first ever case applying the CISG – confirmed this by explaining that the CISG is ‘part of’ Australian law and is thus ‘not to be treated as a foreign law which requires proof as a fact’. [read post]
8 May 2024, 1:01 pm by Kevin
Seaworld Parks & Entertainment, Inc., in which the plaintiffs allege that the Muppets at the Sesame Place theme park are racist? [read post]