Search for: "West Virginia v. United States" Results 21 - 40 of 1,161
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2024, 1:50 pm by David Super
  A resolution introduced by two dozen West Virginia legislators (partially reflecting an ALEC model bill) makes this even more explicit, demanding that a convention start work promptly so that its proposed amendments can go on the November ballot. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 11:53 am by Phil Dixon
Tincher, 90 F. 4th 172 (Jan. 3, 2024) The plaintiff sued an officer for excessive force and other claims in the Southern District of West Virginia. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 12:34 pm by Covington & Burling LLP
West Virginia  On January 18, 2024, a group of West Virginia House members introduced H.B. 4886, which would amend the state’s telemarketing statute to establish “a $1,000 civil administrative penalty, to be levied by the Department of Tax and Revenue, per instance when a phone company knowingly allows a telemarking campaign to call a resident of this state using a United States or West… [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
  To be sure, that wasn’t technically the issue in Griffin’s Case itself:  Chase wasn’t being asked to enjoin Virginia Judge Hugh Sheffey from continuing to serve in office, as would be the case in, e.g., a quo warranto action. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm by Will Baude
As the Supreme Court memorably put it in the case of West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 10:46 am by Frank O. Bowman, III
Constitution which provides that, “The United States shall … protect each [state] against invasion. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm by Josh Blackman
Rev. 53, 55 (1878), https://www.jstor.org/stable/i25110155; Editor, 'Interesting Decision as to Disqualification Under the Fourteenth Amendment,' [Richmond, Virginia] Daily Dispatch, Mar. 5, 1869, at 3; 'Does the Fourteenth Amendment Exclude the Disqualified from a State Legislature,' Wheeling [West Virginia] Daily Register, Aug. 30, 1871, at 4; 'Does the Fourteenth Amendment Exclude the Disqualified from a State… [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 2:02 am by INFORRM
United States The Harvard Cyberlaw Clinic has filed an amicus brief in the case of Hermès International v Rothschild in the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit representing individual creatives and arts and cultural organisations. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 9:15 am by Amy Howe
That prompted the challengers – Ohio, Indiana, and West Virginia, along with trade associations and companies affected by the plan – to come to the Supreme Court last fall, asking the justices to intervene. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm by Noah Brown
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the first oral contraceptive available in the United States without a prescription. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 5:00 pm by Tom Kosakowski
Louis (expanded)University of North Carolina at Charlotte (expanded)University of Tennessee at ChattanoogaUniversity of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (expanded)University of Wyoming (expanded)Utrecht University (Universiteit Utrecht) (expanded)VID Specialized University (VID vitenskapelige høgskole)West Virginia University (expanded)Woods Hole Oceanographic InstitutionWorld Anti-Doping Agency Closed Offices -- It is notoriously difficult to track Ombuds offices… [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 9:06 pm by Bryn Hines
WHAT WE’RE READING THIS WEEK In a forthcoming article in the West Virginia Law Review, Nino Monea, a professor at the United States Military Academy, explored the veterans’ benefits system and how certain aspects of the system undermine its non-adversarial purpose. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 3:00 am by Chip Merlin
West Virginia Supreme Court Justice Richard Neely noted this issue of insurance companies nitpicking claims:1 Insurance is different from any other business. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 3:06 pm by Aaron Moss
On January 1, 2024, Peter Pan will finally enter the public domain in the United States—but not in Barrie’s native United Kingdom. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 7:36 am by Amy Howe
United States, the justices will return to a familiar statute: the Armed Career Criminal Act, which imposes an enhanced sentence for unlawful possession of a firearm if the defendant has three convictions “committed on occasions different from one another. [read post]