Search for: "West v. United Parcel Services"
Results 21 - 40
of 54
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Aug 2014, 8:00 pm
The staff of the City’s Planning and Development Department prepared a report recommending approval of the application, because the proposal “represents a reasonable low intensity use of the undeveloped parcels surrounding the City’s lift station, and would serve as transition between the soon to be developed commercial parking facilities to the east, and the Hopson Road neighborhood to the west and south. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:27 pm
Evans v. [read post]
24 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm
Geopolitical tensions and strategic competition between the United States and China have increasingly influenced the investment landscape in recent years, implicating established regulatory frameworks such as that of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (“CFIUS”), as well as driving non-traditional government actors to take action. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 11:00 pm
See United Parcel Serv. [read post]
27 Jan 2007, 3:18 pm
United Parcel Service, Inc. (1997) 52 Cal.App.4th 1, 12.) [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 3:10 pm
Project Background and Litigation History The Specific Plan covered 13 parcels comprising 797 acres, with a proposed development including up to 4,340 dwelling units with a maximum population increase of 15,928 new residents, as well as other uses including mixed use commercial, parks, open space, and schools. [read post]
30 May 2014, 9:20 am
United Parcel Service, Inc., involves the interpretation of the Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978, which provides that “women affected by pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions shall be treated the same for all employment-related purposes . . . as other persons not so affected but similar in their ability or inability to work. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 10:55 am
United Parcel Service (concerning alleged “preferential treatment” for pregnant employess), and the Supreme Court’s opinion may address the Guidance. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 8:32 am
Joh v. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 5:01 am
This case involves a "wanted poster" and five letters that Collins authored and distributed through the United States Postal Service. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 6:32 pm
The project required a development permit, conditional use permit (CUP), oak tree permit, and a tentative parcel map to consolidate 24 parcels into two lots, one of which would be a 1.98-acre parcel reserved for open space. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 3:00 am
Wilde v. [read post]
Legal Intelligencer: Circuit Split on Materiality Standard in FCA Cases and Choosing the Right Venue
15 Nov 2022, 2:02 pm
In the Second Circuit, United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 6:52 am
United Parcel Service, Inc., 661 F.3d 216 (5th Cir. 2011). (4) See, Lactose Malabsorption NIH (5) The bacteria that create cheese consume lactose, so hard cheeses do not contain significant amounts. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am
City of West Hollywood, 45 Cal.4th 116 (2008) (“Save Tara”), and RiverWatch v. [read post]
20 Apr 2024, 6:37 pm
-led wars in Iraq and Afghanistan had little justification in the internationallaw the United States claimed to be upholding, and the United States prosecuted the wars whileindifferent to the civilian casualties they imposed. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm
Jeffries Homes Housing Project, 306 Mich 638, 647-48; 11 NW2d 272 (1943); Grand Rapids Bd of Ed v Baczewski, 340 Mich 265, 270-71; 65 NW2d 810 (1954); Dep’t of Conservation v Connor, 316 Mich 565, 576-78; 25 NW2d 619 (1947). 9 See Chicago, Detroit, etc v Jacobs, 225 Mich 677; 196 NW 621 (1924); Michigan Air Line Ry v Barnes, 44 Mich 222; 6 NW 651 (1880); Toledo, etc R Co v Dunlap, 47 Mich 456; 11 NW 271 (1882); Detroit, etc R Co v. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 8:55 am
The facts arise out of the Washington Community Service Center, a neighborhood center in the Western Addition in San Francisco. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 11:38 am
At a time when the U.S. is treading lightly to unite the West against a rising (if not already risen) China and preserve some semblance of a rules-based international order, it would be unproductive for Washington to jeopardize its alliances across the Atlantic. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 2:40 am
Source: New York Legislative Retrieval Service (LRS), August 20, 2007. [read post]
