Search for: "White v Deutsch" Results 21 - 40 of 64
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2019, 11:13 am by Michael Froomkin
” That said, after a full-bore takedown of the Trump v. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 9:00 am by Masha Simonova
The White House refused to cooperate in the inquiry, blocking witness testimony and document turnover. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 9:01 am by Tom Smith
She was fired because she exercised free speech in an internal meeting on the Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 4:09 am by Marie Louise
A-G’s opinion published – Merck & Co Inc. v Deutsches Patent- und Markenamt (EPLAW) (The SPC Blog) US: Supreme Court to revisit patentable subject matter eligibility of medical diagnostic methods:  Mayo v Prometheus (Patently-O) (Patent Baristas) (PharmaPatents) (IPBiz) (Patent Law Practice Center) US: Intellectual property problems for personalized medicine (BIOtechNow) US: Supreme Court ruling in Stanford v Roche (IPKat) (IPKat) US:… [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 7:44 am
Deutsche Bahn can't monopolise them, since they are distinctive neither by themselves nor in combination. [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 6:05 am
From the defense side, Michael Krauss opines on the subject at Point of Law;Mark McKenna has the story of a $15M verdict from a defective motorcycle tire;And the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals dumps a $52M punitive damages verdict in White v. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 4:00 am by Lyonette Louis-Jacques
And only once did I imagine the parties in a case and give them faces – State v. [read post]
24 Dec 2015, 5:40 am by SHG
Do we require that white students justify their presence in the classroom? [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 7:26 pm
HeinzPolsterer (Deutsche Telecom) spoke second on why we need standard essential patents (SEPs). [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 11:13 pm by Marie Louise
: Dien Ghin Electronic (S) Pte Ltd v Khek Tai Ting (PatLit)   South Africa Protecting image rights (IP finance)   South Sudan South Sudan: no IP change yet (Afro-IP)   United Kingdom EWHC (Pat) finds Select exclusive licensee of patent but patent invalid and not infringed: Select v. [read post]