Search for: "White v. Guild" Results 21 - 40 of 71
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am by Public Employment Law Press
Here, the Supreme Court properly determined that there were triable issues of fact as to whether the defendants' proffered explanations for not hiring or promoting the plaintiff to a certain position, and for, instead, promoting a white woman to that position, were a pretext for intentional racial discrimination (see Lefort v Kingsbrook Jewish Med. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am by Public Employment Law Press
Here, the Supreme Court properly determined that there were triable issues of fact as to whether the defendants' proffered explanations for not hiring or promoting the plaintiff to a certain position, and for, instead, promoting a white woman to that position, were a pretext for intentional racial discrimination (see Lefort v Kingsbrook Jewish Med. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am by Public Employment Law Press
Here, the Supreme Court properly determined that there were triable issues of fact as to whether the defendants' proffered explanations for not hiring or promoting the plaintiff to a certain position, and for, instead, promoting a white woman to that position, were a pretext for intentional racial discrimination (see Lefort v Kingsbrook Jewish Med. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am by Public Employment Law Press
Here, the Supreme Court properly determined that there were triable issues of fact as to whether the defendants' proffered explanations for not hiring or promoting the plaintiff to a certain position, and for, instead, promoting a white woman to that position, were a pretext for intentional racial discrimination (see Lefort v Kingsbrook Jewish Med. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 9:30 am by azatty
” In fact, here it is (drawn, I guessed at first, from search terms like white, suit and powerful). [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 5:08 am
After last year’s guidelines on black and white marks, reported by the IPKat here, it is now the turn of trade marks sharing elements with little or no distinctiveness.* Pom Wonderful the tenacious -- in pursuit of trade mark rightsNeil's first post of this year is about Pom Wonderful LLC v Hubbard et al, a decision rendered a few days ago by the 9th U.S. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 7:15 am by Eric Muller
On this year’s Day of Remembrance, take a brief moment to recall that it was lawyers -- some of the brightest members of our own guild -- who made this shameful program run. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 3:32 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
But the Enlightenment sought public availability v. private hoarding of knowledge, especially among guilds. [read post]
30 Sep 2018, 4:03 pm by Jody Simon
The Second Circuit contrasted this to Google’s actions – which were found to constitute fair use – in Authors Guild v. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 3:55 am by Ben
Those pesky TurtlesIt seems SiriusXM has decided to rely on the 1940 case of  RCA v Whiteman et al to persuade  U.S. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 11:48 am
He considered whether Defendant’s use was transformative, defined earlier this year by the Second Circuit in Authors Guild, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2013, 6:30 am by Barry Sookman
Computer and Internet Law Weekly Updates for 2013-08-24: Crumpled paper copyright claim dismissed Rains v. [read post]
1 Sep 2013, 6:30 am by Barry Sookman
Computer and Internet Law Weekly Updates for 2013-08-24: Crumpled paper copyright claim dismissed Rains v. [read post]
31 May 2019, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
  Apart from his ACA decisions, in his dissent in Obergefell v. [read post]
29 Oct 2017, 5:31 pm by INFORRM
Neither they nor the open letter called for the University to replace white authors with black ones and there are no plans to do so. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 2:44 am
According to the House of Lords decision in Designer Guild Ltd v Russell Williams (Textiles) Ltd [2000] 1 WLR 2416, Judge Birss had to decide: (a) whether there had been copying; (b) if yes to (a), which features had been copied; and (c) if yes to (a), whether the copying in (b) represents a substantial part of the original work. [read post]