Search for: "White v. Reid" Results 21 - 40 of 107
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Apr 2022, 5:30 am by Josh Blackman
[The namesake of Obamacare took a victory lap at the White House.] [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 11:16 pm
Winthrop's position that a civilian cannot constitutionally be made subject to UCMJ jurisdiction in time of peace (a position nominally supported by Reid v. [read post]
11 May 2010, 7:30 pm by Anna Christensen
As the BLT reported today, tomorrow Elena Kagan is scheduled to visit Capitol Hill tomorrow to meet with key senators – including Judiciary Committee chairman Patrick Leahy, Jeff Sessions, and Majority Leader Harry Reid – in preparation for her upcoming confirmation hearings. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 6:38 am by David Oscar Markus
"The president was moved by the strength of the applicants' post-conviction efforts at atonement, as well as their superior citizenship and individual achievements in the years since their convictions," said White House spokesman Reid Cherlin.3. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 8:21 am by Mike Scarcella
President Obama is scheduled to meet with House Speaker John Boehner and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid at the White House at 1 p.m. today to continue ongoing budget negotiations. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:41 pm by David Super
  In theory, Senator McConnell could refuse to recognize such a filibuster just as he (and his predecessor, Senator Harry Reid) did when they changed the Senate’s rules for judicial confirmations. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 6:00 am by Jennifer
We are proud to stand alongside long-time lawyer gift guide authors like Reid Trautz of Reid My Blog (which, sadly, seems to have ceased updating after its 2015 gift guide) and the ABA Journal. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:50 am by NL
In this case, Lord Reid's observations in R v Knuller (Publishing, Printing and Promotions) Ltd [1973] AC 435 were pertinent: I have said more than once in recent cases that our change of practice in no longer regarding previous decisions of this House as absolutely binding does not mean that whenever we think that a previous decision was wrong we should reverse it. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:50 am by NL
In this case, Lord Reid's observations in R v Knuller (Publishing, Printing and Promotions) Ltd [1973] AC 435 were pertinent: I have said more than once in recent cases that our change of practice in no longer regarding previous decisions of this House as absolutely binding does not mean that whenever we think that a previous decision was wrong we should reverse it. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
United States (1992) and Printz v. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 6:37 am by Anna Christensen
Continuing the post-game analysis of McDonald v. [read post]