Search for: "White v. United States Department of Justice"
Results 21 - 40
of 1,688
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2016, 3:22 pm
” United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 3:22 pm
” United States v. [read post]
19 May 2011, 1:00 pm
The PRESIDENT, The White House. [read post]
31 May 2011, 9:00 am
It represents part of a concerted effort by the Department of State and the Department of Justice to develop modern extradition relationships to enhance the ability of the United States to prosecute serious offenders, including, especially, narcotics traffickers and terrorists. [read post]
18 May 2011, 1:00 pm
It represents part of a concerted effort by the Department of State and the Department of Justice to develop modern extradition relationships to enhance the United States ability to prosecute serious offenders including, especially, narcotics traffickers. [read post]
10 May 2011, 1:00 pm
The Department of Justice joins the Department of State in favoring approval of this Treaty by the Senate at an early date. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 11:15 am
Whiting By: Ben Weeks and Marilyn Clark On May 26, 2011, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 6:07 am
The Supreme Court of the United States will reconsider the issue of affirmative action in higher education for the first time since its 2003 decision in Grutter v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 6:07 am
The Supreme Court of the United States will reconsider the issue of affirmative action in higher education for the first time since its 2003 decision in Grutter v. [read post]
4 Aug 2012, 6:35 am
In White v White, 2012 WL 3041660 (S.D.N.Y.) pro se Plaintiff Keith White brought an action against his ex-wife Gabriela White under the Hague Convention, seeking the return of the parties' son S. to Keith and repayment of monies that Keith paid to Gabriela since 2005. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 3:46 pm
§ 793, prohibits “willfully retain[ing]” information “relating to the national defense which information the possessor has reason to believe could be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation” and “fails to deliver it on demand to the officer or employee of the United States entitled to receive it” (emphasis added). [read post]
14 May 2019, 4:47 am
And third, as Daniel Hemel and Eric Posner have pointed out, the Supreme Court did not apply a clear statement in United States v. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 4:52 pm
The United States of America is seeking justice against Donald Trump. [read post]
28 May 2015, 7:05 am
Doug Coulson, Carnegie Mellon University, Department of English, has posted British Imperialism, the Indian Independence Movement, and the Racial Eligibility Provisions of the Naturalization Act: United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 9:30 pm
The Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 7:10 am
White v. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 9:22 am
The United States Department of Justice Our checks found one contrast error at https://www.justice.gov/ and detected three additional empty buttons on internal pages. [read post]
31 May 2011, 1:00 pm
It is an important part of a concerted effort by the Department of State and the Department of Justice to modernize the legal tools available for the extradition of serious offenders. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 12:37 pm
United States Citizenship & Immigration Services. 407 F.Supp.3d 311 (D.D.C. 2019); Knight First Amendment Institute v. [read post]
